Centralized resource usage visualization service for large-scale network topologies

ABSTRACT

Methods and apparatus for centralized resource utilization visualization in distributed systems are disclosed. Metrics are collected from a plurality of sources in a distributed system, including network traffic metrics collected from nodes implementing a network-accessible service. A topology representing at least one of (a) a relationship between respective client accounts to which a first and second node are assigned, or (b) one or more network links between the first and second nodes is generated. Respective networking performance indicators of the first node and the second node are provided for inclusion in a resource heat map corresponding to the topology.

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.15/613,582, filed Jun. 5, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 14/089,230, filed Nov. 25, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No.9,674,042, which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in theirentirety.

BACKGROUND

Many companies and other organizations operate computer networks thatinterconnect numerous computing systems to support their operations,such as with the computing systems being co-located (e.g., as part of alocal network) or instead located in multiple distinct geographicallocations (e.g., connected via one or more private or publicintermediate networks). For example, data centers housing significantnumbers of interconnected computing systems have become commonplace,such as private data centers that are operated by and on behalf of asingle organization, and public data centers that are operated byentities as businesses to provide computing resources to customers. Somepublic data center operators provide network access, power, and secureinstallation facilities for hardware owned by various customers, whileother public data center operators provide “full service” facilitiesthat also include hardware resources made available for use by theircustomers. However, as the scale and scope of typical data centers hasincreased, the tasks of provisioning, administering, and managing thephysical computing resources have become increasingly complicated.

The advent of virtualization technologies for commodity hardware hasprovided benefits with respect to managing large-scale computingresources for many customers with diverse needs, allowing variouscomputing resources to be efficiently and securely shared by multiplecustomers. For example, virtualization technologies may allow a singlephysical computing machine to be shared among multiple users byproviding each user with one or more virtual machines hosted by thesingle physical computing machine. Each virtual machine can be thoughtof as a software simulation acting as a distinct logical computingsystem that provides users with the illusion that they are the soleoperators and administrators of a given hardware computing resource,while also providing application isolation and security among thevarious virtual machines. Furthermore, some virtualization technologiesare capable of providing virtual resources that span two or morephysical resources, such as a single virtual machine with multiplevirtual processors that spans multiple distinct physical computingsystems.

As the functionality and features supported by providers of virtualizedcompute, storage and networking resources grows, and as the fleet ofhardware platforms that are used by large-scale providers grows, theimplementation of administrative control operations on the platforms,such as managing network traffic flows, can itself become fairlycomplex. In many cases, the functionality and usability of applicationsrun on such platforms may rely extensively on network communicationswith other parts of the provider network, and/or with external entitiessuch as clients or third parties. In an attempt to achieve the desiredapplication performance levels, the operators of such distributedsystems may have typically set up high bandwidth networkinfrastructures. However, despite the provisioning of high bandwidthnetworking devices and links, network bandwidth may in many cases becomea bottleneck resource, especially given the time-varying andlocation-dependent bandwidth requirements for many types of deployedapplications. Virtualization may make managing network bandwidth (aswell as latency and other networking characteristics) an even harderproblem, as the various virtual machines being implemented on a singlehardware platform may have widely varying networking requirements thathave to be met using the platform's shared networking components, andalso because the set of applications and virtual machines instantiatedat a given hardware platform may change over time.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a system in which a centralizednetworking configuration service is implemented to manage networktraffic at a plurality of nodes of a distributed computing environment,according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a provider network environment in whichrespective networking configuration servers are established in each ofseveral availability containers, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a networking manager module capable ofinterpreting traffic classification metadata at an instance host of avirtualized computing service, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 4a-4c illustrate respective examples of protocols that may be usedto transmit traffic classification metadata to an instance host,according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a classification tree data structurethat may be used to represent network traffic categories for networkingconfiguration at a device of a distributed system, according to at leastsome embodiments.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a hierarchical data structure that maybe used to combine network traffic category information of a pluralityof instance hosts at a data center, according to at least someembodiments.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a traffic classification proceduregraph that may be used together with a classification tree to determinethe category of a unit of network traffic, according to at least someembodiments.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example of a use of a lookup-table node of atraffic classification procedure graph, according to at least someembodiments.

FIG. 9 illustrates an example of a responsiveness metric that may beutilized to determine values for one or more parameters of a networkingconfiguration service, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating aspects of operations that may beperformed to configure and initialize components of a networkingconfiguration service, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 11 is a flow diagram illustrating aspects of operations that may beperformed to generate and distribute traffic classification metadata ofa networking configuration service, according to at least someembodiments.

FIG. 12 is a flow diagram illustrating aspects of operations that may beperformed to change networking management parameters in response totriggering events, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating aspects of operations that may beperformed to provide a unified view of networking-related statusinformation to a client of a distributed system, according to at leastsome embodiments.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of a customizable heat map that may begenerated by a topology visualization server for at least a subset ofthe nodes of a distributed system, according to at least someembodiments.

FIG. 15 illustrates examples of different subsets of collected metricsthat may be used to generate heat maps for service administrators andnon-administrative clients of a service, according to at least someembodiments.

FIG. 16 illustrates an example of a web-based programmatic interfacethat may be used to display heat maps for network topologies, accordingto at least some embodiments.

FIG. 17 illustrates example elements of a visualization request that maybe received by a topology visualization server via a programmaticinterface, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 18 illustrates aspects of operations that may be performed togenerate topology visualizations comprising performance indicators ofvarious nodes of a distributed system, according to at least someembodiments.

FIG. 19 illustrates an example of a set of compute instance types thatmay be implemented for a network-accessible service, with respectivebandwidth limits and respective bandwidth usage pricing policies set forthe different instance types, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 20 illustrates example elements of a resource usage limit reductionrequest that may be received by a networking configuration server,according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 21 illustrates an example of the establishment of an overallresource usage limit setting for a client account of anetwork-accessible service, and the establishment of related resourceusage limit settings for user groups, individual users and linkedaccounts, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 22 illustrates aspects of operations that may be performed toenable clients to reduce resource usage limits for one or more nodes ofa network-accessible service, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 23 illustrates aspects of operations that may be performed toenable clients to submit queries associated with resource usage limitsat nodes of a distributed system, according to at least someembodiments.

FIG. 24 is a block diagram illustrating an example computing device thatmay be used in at least some embodiments.

While embodiments are described herein by way of example for severalembodiments and illustrative drawings, those skilled in the art willrecognize that embodiments are not limited to the embodiments ordrawings described. It should be understood, that the drawings anddetailed description thereto are not intended to limit embodiments tothe particular form disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is tocover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within thespirit and scope as defined by the appended claims. The headings usedherein are for organizational purposes only and are not meant to be usedto limit the scope of the description or the claims. As used throughoutthis application, the word “may” is used in a permissive sense (i.e.,meaning having the potential to), rather than the mandatory sense (i.e.,meaning must). Similarly, the words “include,” “including,” and“includes” mean including, but not limited to.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various embodiments of methods and apparatus for configuring networkingoperations in a large-scale distributed system such as a providernetwork are described. In some embodiments, a centralized networkingconfiguration management scheme may be implemented, according to whichvarious types of decisions regarding bandwidth limits, latencymanagement, and other traffic shaping parameters for numerous nodes(such as hosts and network devices) of the distributed system may bemade at one or more networking configuration servers (NCSs). (In someembodiments networking configuration servers may also be referred to as“bandwidth arbitration servers”, as the servers' primary responsibilitymay be to manage bandwidth usage at components of a distributed systemvia the imposition of respective bandwidth limits for various trafficcategories.) Metadata to be used to implement the decisions, includingfor example traffic classification procedures or rules and networkingconfiguration options for various categories of traffic, may betransmitted in a portable, easy-to-parse format from the NCSs to thenodes of the distributed system. At the nodes of the distributed system,the received metadata may be interpreted, for example by networkingmanagement modules within virtualization management software, toclassify packets or other units of network traffic schedule as they aregenerated or received, and to apply the decisions made at the BASs toschedule and/or throttle transmissions of the traffic. Theresponsibility of generating the logic to be used for traffic shaping(which may at least in some cases require analysis of non-trivial inputdata sets obtained from a variety of sources) may thus be handled by thecentralized networking configuration servers, and the logic may beapplied at the various nodes by relatively simple control modules. Themetadata transmitted to a given node may be customized specifically forthat node in at least some embodiments, based on metrics collected fromthe node, the nature of the applications being run on that node, and soon. The networking configuration management techniques may includesupport for programmatic interfaces that enable clients of thedistributed systems to obtain unified or consolidate views of thenetworking-related status of resources of interest in some embodiments.In at least some embodiments, resource usage indicators (such as ratiosof measured bandwidth to applicable bandwidth limits) may be displayedusing heat maps or other visualization tools. Programmatic interfacesmay also be implemented in at least some embodiments to enable clientsand/or administrators to submit various types of configuration requeststo the centralized networking configuration system, which may forexample result in changes to the classification-related rules and/ornetworking settings determined at the NCSs and disseminated to variousnodes. In at least some embodiments, clients may be able to requestreductions in the bandwidth limits (or other types of resource usagelimits) on various resources such as service instances. In at least someimplementations, part or all of the networking configuration scheme maybe implemented as a web service, e.g., one or more web servicesprogrammatic interfaces may be supported for various types ofinteractions with the networking configuration servers.

In much of the following description, a provider network is used as anexample of a distributed system in which the centralized networkingconfiguration techniques may be implemented. Networks set up by anentity such as a company or a public sector organization to provide oneor more network-accessible services (such as various types ofcloud-based database, computing or storage services) accessible via theInternet and/or other networks to a distributed set of clients may betermed provider networks herein. At least some of the services may bepackaged for client use in service units called “instances”: forexample, a virtual machine instantiated by a virtualized computingservice may represent a “compute instance”, and a storage device such asa block-level volume instantiated by a storage service may be referredto as a “storage instance”. In some embodiments, instances ofhigher-level services may be packaged using compute instances and/orstorage instances—e.g., a database instance may be built using acombination of compute and storage instances in some embodiments.Computing devices such as servers and/or storage devices at which suchunits of various network-accessible services of a provider network areimplemented may be referred to as “instance hosts” or more simply as“hosts” herein. In the remainder of this document, the term “client”,when used as the source or destination of a given communication, mayrefer to any of the computing devices, processes, hardware modules orsoftware modules that are owned by, managed by, or allocated to, anentity (such as an organization, a group with multiple users or a singleuser) that is capable of accessing and utilizing at least onenetwork-accessible service of the provider network.

A given provider network may include numerous data centers (which may bedistributed across different geographical regions) hosting variousresource pools, such as collections of physical and/or virtualizedcomputer servers, storage servers with one or more storage devices each,networking equipment and the like, needed to implement, configure anddistribute the infrastructure and services offered by the provider. Anumber of different hardware and/or software components, some of whichmay be instantiated or executed at different data centers or indifferent geographical regions, may collectively be used to implementeach of the services in various embodiments. Clients may interact withresources and services at the provider network from devices located atclient-owned or client-managed premises or data centers external to theprovider network, and/or from devices within the provider network. In atleast some embodiments, a virtualized computing service offering varioustypes of compute instances may be implemented within the providernetwork, and such compute instances may be allocated to clients. Otherservices of the provider network may be accessed from such computeinstances as well as from external locations. It is noted that althoughprovider networks serve as one example context in which many of thebandwidth management techniques described herein may be implemented,those techniques may also be applied to other types of distributedsystems than provider networks, e.g., to large-scale distributedapplication environments in which different components of theapplications may have time-varying bandwidth needs.

According to at least one embodiment, a number of NCSs may beinstantiated at various locations within a provider network, with thenumber and distribution of NCSs being determined, for example, based onperformance and/or availability criteria as described below. The NCSsmay be configured to obtain network-related metrics from various nodesof the provider network, such as from instance hosts of various types ofservices being implemented in the provider network, and/or from varioustypes of network devices (switches, routers, gateways and the like) tohelp in making bandwidth management decisions. For example, informationregarding the actual incoming and outgoing network traffic at a givenhost during a time interval, the number of packets dropped during a timeinterval, the number of packets whose transmission was delayed due toenforcement of current bandwidth limits, the sizes of the packets, theapplications on whose behalf the traffic occurred to or from a givennode, the clients on whose behalf the traffic was initiated, and/or theIP addresses of the endpoints involved in various transmissions, may becollected in various embodiments. In some embodiments, input from othersources may also be used in making bandwidth management decisions: forexample, security services may be implemented in some provider networksto attempt to identify network intrusions or attacks such as distributeddenial of service (DDOS) attacks, and alerts regarding potential attacksmay influence bandwidth limit changes or traffic category definitions.In at least one embodiment, a provider network may include services thataggregate network traffic metrics on a per-IP-address basis or on aper-client basis, e.g., for administrative and/or billing purposes, andsuch aggregators may also provide input to the NCSs. In someembodiments, clients and/or administrators of one or morenetwork-accessible services of the provider network may submitbandwidth-related requests or other configuration requests to the NCSs,e.g., to override one or more bandwidth management parameters for aspecified instance host or network device, and such requests may alsocontribute to the decisions made at the NCSs.

Based at least in part on such inputs, a given NCS may determine variousnetworking configuration options and/or procedures to be used at a givennode of the provider network. In some cases, one or more global and/orlocal networking management policies may also be taken into account whendetermining the parameters. In one embodiment, a set or hierarchy oftraffic categories may be determined, together with various networkingconfiguration options such as bandwidth limits, latency goals orconstraints, and so on, for each of the categories. In someimplementations a flat classification (equivalent to a hierarchy withjust one level) may be used, while in other implementations multi-levelhierarchies with parent-child relationships between nodes of differentlevels may be used. In the subsequent description, the term “hierarchy”as used herein, is intended to cover both single-level or flatclassifications and multi-level classifications indicating parent-childrelationships. In addition to the hierarchy, a procedure (e.g., asequence of decision steps or rules to be applied) to be used toclassify any given network packet (or any appropriate unit of datatransfer) into one of the categories may also be determined. Theinformation regarding traffic categories and the logic or rules to beused to map traffic units to the categories may together be termed“traffic classification metadata” or “classification metadata” herein.Since a given host may comprise different combinations of serviceinstances than another host in at least some embodiments, and thenetworking requirements of the applications being implemented at theservice instances of a given host may differ from the networkingrequirements of other applications (either at the same host or at otherhosts), different sets of networking configuration parameters may beappropriate for different hosts. In at least some embodiments,therefore, classification metadata may be customized for at least somenodes—e.g., the classification metadata generated for one node of theprovider network, such as an instance host IH1, may differ from theclassification metadata generated for a different node, such as instancehost IH2. Different sets of traffic categories may be defined for thedifferent nodes, for example, or different bandwidth limits or latencyrequirements may be set for the same traffic category, or at least somesteps of the traffic unit classification procedure may differ. In atleast some implementations, the networking configuration parametersdetermined for various network devices, such as for switches, routers,gateways, or load-balancers, or for network-attached storage devices,may be derived at least in part from the bandwidth management parametersof a set of hosts associated with or affected by the devices—e.g., if aparticular switch is used for incoming and outgoing traffic to eighthosts, the bandwidth limits of the switch for a certain category oftraffic may be derived from the bandwidth limits of the eight hosts.

The traffic categories defined by a NCS for a given node may differ fromone another in various properties in different embodiments. In oneembodiment, different categories may be created for different sets ofnetwork endpoints—e.g., the IP (Internet Protocol) addresses of thedestinations (or sources) of traffic may be used to categorize thetraffic. In another embodiment, the kinds of application on whose behalfthe traffic flows may be used for traffic categorization—e.g.database-related traffic may be placed in one category, and trafficrelated to high performance computing may be placed in another category.In some embodiments, the clients on whose behalf the traffic isgenerated, and/or the budgets of the clients or aspects of contractualagreements reached with the clients, may be used to define trafficcategories. In some embodiments in which a plurality ofnetwork-accessible services are implemented in the distributed system,traffic categories may be defined on the basis of the service on behalfof which a particular unit of traffic is generated. If service-basedclassification is being used and a given packet is associated with twoor more services, e.g., if a packet of data is being transferred from astorage service on behalf of a database instance of a database service,the packet may be classified as belonging to the source service (i.e.,the sending side) or the destination service (the receiving side) invarious embodiments. In at least one embodiment, clients may provideindications of one or more properties that can be used by the networkingconfiguration service to classify traffic units—for example, a clientmay request that some set of compute instances be identified ahigh-priority instances at least temporarily, and the traffic to or fromthose instances may accordingly be classified as high-priority trafficwith high bandwidth limits.

In some embodiments, an NCS may use a tree or similar hierarchical datastructure to model or represent the traffic categories for a givenprovider network node, with respective bandwidth limits and/or othernetworking configuration options being assigned to each node of thetree. In at least some implementations, a bandwidth summation policy mayapply to a classification tree. According to such a policy, if a givenparent node P with child nodes C1, C2, . . . , Ck in the tree has abandwidth limit of X bits/second, the sum of the actual trafficassociated with the child nodes C1, C2, . . . , Ck during a given timeperiod may not exceed the bandwidth limit of the parent. Consider anexample in which P's bandwidth limit is set to 1 Gbit/second foroutgoing traffic, and P has two child nodes C1 and C2, each of whosebandwidth limit is also set to 1 Gbit/second for outgoing traffic. If,during a given second, 0.6 Gbit of traffic classified as C1 trafficflows from the instance, no more than 0.4 Gbit of traffic classified asC2 traffic may be permitted, even though the individual limit definedfor C2 is higher. Summation policies based on parent-child relationshipsmay not be relevant or useful for some types of networking configurationoptions determined by NCSs in various embodiments, of course, such aslatency constraints or goals, quality-of-service goals, packetfragmentation settings, or settings determined at least in part onpacket sizes.

In addition to using a tree or tree-like structure to represent the setof traffic categories, in some embodiments the NCS may also generate asecond data structure to model the procedure to be used to classifytraffic units into the categories. The second data structure, which maybe termed a classification procedure graph, may comprise one or moresequences of decision nodes in some implementations, in which eachsuccessive node of a given sequence indicates one or more criteria to beused to classify a traffic unit to a narrower category. In at least oneimplementation, some of the decision nodes of the classificationprocedure graph may include a lookup table (such as a hash table) thatmay be used for selecting one category from multiple category choices.The entries of the lookup table may be indexed based on one or moreproperties of the network traffic units that are to be classified—e.g.,a portion or all of a destination or source IP address may be used forindexing, or a portion of another packet header field or even thecontents of the body of the packet may be used to look up a particularentry in the table. In at least some embodiments, a lookup table entrymay in turn lead to another classification procedure graph or sub-graph.Thus, in such implementations, a given property of a packet may firstlead to a selection of a lookup table entry from among several possiblelookup table entries, and then the processing of the selected lookuptable entry in turn may lead to the traversal of another set of decisionnodes (which may themselves include other lookup tables), ultimatelyconcluding in the identification of the category of the packet. Fairlyelaborate fine-grained category mappings may be defined for networkpackets and/or other traffic units using such procedure steps in variousembodiments, enabling sophisticated traffic shaping. Differentclassification hierarchies and/or procedures may be generated forincoming and outgoing traffic in at least some implementations.

Having generated metadata comprising a set of traffic categories withassociated networking configuration options, and logic to map networktraffic units into the categories, in some embodiments an NCS maygenerate portable representations of the metadata for transmission tothe nodes where the metadata is to be applied. For example, in variousimplementations, one or both components of the metadata may be encodedaccording to an industry standard protocol or language such as JSON(JavaScript Object Notation), XML (Extensible Markup Language), YAML (aserialization format whose acronym has a number of possible expansionssuch as “Yet Another Markup Language” or “YAML Ain't Markup Language”).In other implementations, a proprietary encoding technique or protocolmay be used to generate the portable versions of the data structures.

The portable representations may be transmitted to the target node ofthe provider network or distributed system, e.g., to acontrol/administrative module such as a network management module thancan parse the representations and implement the procedure indicated bythe procedure graph. Using the received metadata, various traffic unitsmay subsequently be classified into the appropriate categories at thetarget node, and various network transmissions may be scheduled and/orthrottled or delayed in accordance with networking configuration optionssuch as bandwidth limits or latency requirements indicated for theirrespective traffic categories. Metrics collected during suchtransmissions may be fed back to the NCSs, enabling refinement of themetadata for subsequent time periods. Thus, a feedback loop may beestablished between the NCSs and the nodes at which the decisions madeat the NCSs are ultimately implemented, allowing dynamic adjustment ofnetworking management parameters over time. Using such customizabletraffic classification and configuration techniques may enable thecentralized networking configuration system to control and shape trafficat various parts of the provider network to any desired level ofgranularity in various embodiments.

Various approaches may be used for the distribution of theclassification metadata to the target nodes in different embodiments.For example, in one embodiment, an NCS may be configured to periodically(e.g., at least once every X minutes) “push” classification metadata toeach of the hosts and/or network devices to which the NCS has beenassigned. In some embodiments, various types of triggering events (suchas the detection of potential network intrusions or attacks) may lead tothe dissemination of new classification metadata. For example, anattempt to mitigate or limit the impact of an attack, bandwidth limitsat some set of nodes may be lowered, or new categories with lowbandwidth limits may be defined, as described below in further detail.In another embodiment, at least some nodes of the provider network may“pull” traffic classification metadata from their assigned NCSs, e.g.,by sending metadata requests to the NCSs and receiving the metadata inresponse. In some embodiments, combinations of the scheduled pushtechnique, the triggering event-based distribution of metadata, and/orthe node-initiated pull technique, may be used.

In some embodiments a provider network or other distributed system maybe organized into a plurality of geographical regions, and each regionmay include one or more availability containers, which may also betermed “availability zones” herein. An availability container in turnmay comprise one or more distinct locations or data centers, engineeredin such a way that the resources in a given availability container areinsulated from failures in other availability containers. That is, afailure in one availability container may not be expected to betemporally or causally correlated with a failure in any otheravailability container; thus, the availability profile of a resourceinstance or control server is intended to be independent of theavailability profile of resource instances or control servers in adifferent availability container. Clients may be able to protect theirapplications from failures at a single location by launching multipleapplication instances in respective availability containers. At the sametime, in some implementations, inexpensive and low latency networkconnectivity may be provided between resource instances that residewithin the same geographical region (and network transmissions betweenresources of the same availability container may be even faster). Toachieve desired levels of availability and/or performance for thenetworking configuration system, in some such embodiments, at least onenetworking configuration server may be set up in each availability zone.In some embodiments, at least one NCS may be established within eachdata center. In some embodiments, the number of NCSs to be set up withina given region, availability container or data center may be determinedbased at least in part on performance requirements—e.g., on how quicklythe networking configuration system can respond to network attacks orother triggering events by generating modified bandwidth limits andapplying the modified limits at the appropriate set of nodes.

According to one embodiment, one or more programmatic interfaces (suchas APIs (application programming interfaces), web pages, command-linetools, graphical user interfaces, and the like) may be implemented bythe networking configuration system, for use by clients and/or otherservices of the provider network. In one such embodiment, as mentionedabove, clients or administrators of various services may submitconfiguration requests such as bandwidth override requests to set orchange networking configuration options for specific service instancesor hosts. Some clients may wish to increase (or decrease) bandwidthlimits for at least some applications for at least some time intervals,for example. In some embodiments, a given client may be allocatednumerous service instances (such as hundreds or thousands of computeinstances, storage instances, database instances, and the like) and theclient may wish to obtain an up-to-date consolidated view of thenetworking status (including applicable bandwidth limits, latencysettings and the like) of a subset of their service instances. Thenetworking configuration service's programmatic interfaces may be usedto provide such a unified view in some embodiments, e.g., by a consoleservice of the provider network or by some other consolidated networkview generators. The programmatic interfaces may also be used by otherservices in some embodiments, such as an instance placement service thatis responsible for identifying the instance hosts at which new serviceinstances are to be launched. When considering a particular instancehost as a candidate for a new service instance, such a placement servicemay obtain information from the networking configuration service usingon the programmatic interfaces, such as recent bandwidth usage trends atthe candidate, the number of times network transmissions have recentlybeen throttled and/or the currently established network bandwidth limitsor latency settings for that instance host, and use such information indetermining the placement of the new service instance.

Example System Environments

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a system 100 in which a centralizednetworking configuration service is implemented to manage networktraffic at a plurality of nodes of a distributed computing environment,according to at least some embodiments. As shown, a pool 182 ofnetworking configuration servers 180 such as NCS 180A and NCS 180B maybe established. In some embodiments, the NCSs 180 may be distributedamong various data centers of the computing environment, as illustratedin FIG. 2 and described below. A given NCS 180 may for example compriseone or more software and/or hardware modules in different embodiments,and may itself be implemented using a plurality of computing devices insome cases. The NCSs 180 may be configured to receive inputs fromseveral different types of sources. Customizable traffic classificationlogic and networking configuration options such as bandwidth limits tobe applied at various elements of the distributed computing environmentmay be determined by the NCSs on the basis of the inputs and/or in viewof global networking management policies 122 in the depicted embodiment.From the perspective of the networking configuration service, theelements of the distributed computing environment may be classified intothree high-level categories: measurement-related components 107,decision components 108, and implementation components 109. Themeasurement-related components 107 may comprise various input sourcesfor the NCSs; the decision components 108 may comprise the NCSsthemselves; and the implementation components 109 may represent entitiesat which the decisions are executed to shape network traffic, or whereoutput generated by the decision components is utilized for otherpurposes. A feedback loop, similar to a classical control systemfeedback loop, may be established by obtaining measurements from some ofthe implementation components (such as service instance hosts 144 and/ornetwork devices 145) and using those metrics to determine subsequentdecisions by the NCSs 180, which may in turn be implemented, leading toadditional measurements that in turn influence future decisions.

A number of types of networking-related metrics may be gathered frominstance hosts 144 and/or networking devices 145 e.g., by metricscollectors 125, and placed in a metrics database 190 accessible by theNCSs 180 in the depicted embodiments. For example, such metrics mayinclude the incoming and outgoing network traffic rates at a given hostduring a time interval (e.g., expressed in bytes or in packets), thenumber of network connections corresponding to various protocols such asTCP (Transmission Control Protocol) or UDP (User Datagram Protocol), thenumber of packets dropped during a time interval and the causes of thepacket drops, the number of packets whose transmission was delayed dueto enforcement of current bandwidth limits, the distributions of thesizes of the packets, the applications on whose behalf the trafficoccurred to or from a given node, the clients on whose behalf thetraffic was initiated, latencies associated with packet delivery, and/orthe IP addresses of the endpoints involved in various transmissions. Inaddition to the metrics stored in database 190, the NCSs may alsoreceive input from additional input data sources 110 of system 100, suchas security service 111 or traffic metric aggregators 112 A securityservice 111 may be configured to monitor traffic patterns at variousparts of the system 100 to detect network intrusions or attacks (some ofwhich may originate outside the system 100, e.g., from various locationson the public Internet, while others may originate at some of theinstance hosts 144 themselves). When a suspicious traffic pattern isdetected, e.g., if there is a sudden and sustained burst of high trafficdirected to a given network address, the security service 111 may informthe NCSs 180, which may take mitigating actions. For example, the NCSs180 may generate new traffic categories and corresponding bandwidthlimits to be applied, or alter the bandwidth limits of existingcategories, and transmit the newly-modified or generated classificationmetadata to the appropriate hosts to limit the impact of the potentialsecurity event. Traffic metric aggregators 112 may combine metricstransmitted from the collectors 125 into buckets, e.g., per-IP-addressbuckets or per-client buckets, and representations of the buckets may bemade available to the NCSs, to be considered when making networkingconfiguration decisions.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, client override requests 130 and/oradministrator override requests 131 may also play a role in thedecisions made by the NCSs 180. For example, based on the globalpolicies 122 and other metrics, a NCS 180 may determine that thebandwidth limit for a given category C1 of traffic at an instance host144 is to be set to 2 Gbit/sec for the next time interval beingconsidered. However, a client whose compute instance happens to beinstantiated at that instance host may submit a request for 5 Gbit/secbandwidth for that compute instance, or an administrator of a servicebeing implemented at that instance host may submit a request to limitthe bandwidth to 1 Gbit/sec, and such requests may be used by the NCSsto override other factors in the depicted embodiment. In embodiments inwhich clients are charged billing amounts for network traffic inproportion to the amount of traffic incurred on their behalf, someclients may wish to impose upper limits on their bandwidth usage tocontrol costs, and such upper limits may also represent examples ofoverride requests 130.

According to some embodiments, a given NCS 180 may generate trafficclassification metadata for one or more instance hosts 144 and/ornetwork devices 145 to which the NCS has been assigned. In at least someembodiments, classification metadata may be generated for storagedevices as well, such as for network-attached storage (NAS) devices. Themetadata may comprise a hierarchy of one or more levels of trafficcategories, which may be represented as a tree data structure, forexample, in which each node of the tree represents a respective trafficcategory and has an associated set of networking configuration optionsor settings (such as bandwidth limits or latency requirements). In someembodiments, traffic summation policies may apply to the classificationtrees, as described below with reference to FIG. 5, according to whichthe actual traffic rates for traffic categories represented as childnodes of a parent node may not exceed the bandwidth limit of the parentnode. In some embodiments in which respective classification trees aregenerated for each instance host 144, the host-level classificationtrees may be combined into rack-level trees or even data-center levelclassification trees by the NCS 180, as described below with referenceto FIG. 6. Such higher-level trees may be used, for example, to obtain awider perspective on network traffic flow, and/or for makinghigher-level decisions than are possible per instance host or pernetwork device.

In addition to the classification trees, the traffic classificationmetadata may also include procedures to be used to map network trafficunits such as packets to the various categories defined in theclassification trees in the depicted embodiment. The steps of theprocedures may be represented, for example, as decision nodes ofprocedure graphs. A given procedure graph may comprise one or moredecision node sequences in some implementations, in which successivenodes include indications of criteria to be used to match networktraffic units to successively narrower traffic categories. In at leastone implementation, some decision nodes may include lookup tables suchas hash tables. Using such a lookup table node, a given packet ortraffic unit may be mapped to one of many different categories using asingle graph node, thus reducing the size and complexity of theprocedure graphs. In some cases lookup table node entries may serve aspointers to other procedure graphs or sub-graphs, thus enablingfine-grained classification logic or criteria to be used. Examples ofprocedure graphs and decision nodes incorporating lookup tables areshown in FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 and described below in further detail. In atleast some embodiments, the classification metadata may be stored in aclassification database 192, in addition to being distributed to theappropriate instance hosts 144 and/or network devices 145.

According to some embodiments, the metadata generated at the NCSs 180may be transmitted to their intended destinations via distributionsystem 127. Distribution system 127 may itself comprise a plurality ofintermediary nodes in some implementations, which may also be used fordistributing other types of metadata to various nodes of the system 100,such as routing information and/or access control lists. In embodimentsin which database 192 is used as a repository of generated metadata,nodes of the distribution system 127 may for example be notified (e.g.,by subscribing to a notification mechanism) when the database 192 isupdated, and may transfer the new metadata to the appropriatedestinations accordingly. In some embodiments, portable representationsof the metadata (e.g., the classification trees and procedures) may begenerated, either by the NCSs themselves or by the distribution system127, using protocols such as JSON, XML, YAML or proprietary techniquesor languages. In one implementation, the portable representations may bestored in database 192. At the destinations, the received metadatarepresentations may be parsed, e.g., by networking management modules ofvirtualization management software stacks in the case of instance hosts144, as illustrated in FIG. 3 and described in further detail below.

In one embodiment, one or more API servers 170 may be set up to handlerequests directed at the NCSs 180 from other output destinations 150 ofthe implementation subsystem 109. For example, one or more servers maybe configured as consolidated network view generators 152, to provideclients with a unified view of the networking status of selectedportions of the distributed environment. In one implementation, forexample, clients may be assigned hundreds or thousands of serviceinstances at various instance hosts, and may be able to view varioustypes of metrics (such as recent incoming/outgoing traffic rates,dropped packet rates, applicable bandwidth limits and the like) fortheir instances via a console implemented by the view generators 152. Inat least one embodiment, a placement service 151 may also be able toaccess network bandwidth limits and other metrics from the NCSs via theAPI servers 170, which may be helpful in making decisions regarding theinstance hosts to be used for new service instances that are to belaunched, or in moving existing service instances to instance hosts withless bandwidth contention.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a provider network environment in whichrespective networking configuration servers are established in each ofseveral availability containers, according to at least some embodiments.As shown, provider network 202 may comprise several availabilitycontainers 203, such as 203A, 203B and 203C in the depicted embodiment.Each availability container may in turn comprise one or more datacenters 205, such as data centers 205A and 205B in availabilitycontainer 203A, data center 205C in availability container 203B, anddata center 205D in availability container 203C. As described earlier,each availability container 203 may be designed and engineered in such away (e.g., with respective independent infrastructure elements such aselectrical power sources, and with some geographical distance betweendifferent availability containers) that the effects of various types offailure events in any given availability container may typically belimited to that availability container. Hence, failures and/or errorsmay typically not spread across availability container boundaries, andthe different availability containers may be deemed to have independentfailure profiles or independent availability profiles. Even if a givenavailability container suffers a natural disaster, for example, otheravailability containers may be expected to remain operational.

In keeping with the design goal of avoiding or reducingcross-availability-container dependencies, at least one NCS 180 may beestablished in each availability container 203 in the depictedembodiment. For example, NCSs 180A and 180B are set up respectively indata centers 205A and 205B of availability container 203A, NCS 180C isestablished in data center 205C of availability container 203B, and NCS180D is located in data center 205D of availability container 203C. NCS180A may be configured to generate classification metadata for instancehosts 144A of one or more network-accessible services (such as avirtualized computing service or a storage service) being implemented atdata center 205A, and for network devices 145A located in data center205A. Similarly, NCS 180B may be assigned the task of generatingclassification metadata for instance hosts 144B and network devices145B, NCS 180C may be responsible for generating classification metadatafor instance hosts 144C and network devices 145C, and NCS 180D may beconfigured for generating classification metadata for instance hosts144D and network devices 145D. Although a single NCS is shown in eachdata center 205 in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, a plurality ofNCSs may be set up in a given data center 205 (depending on, forexample, performance requirements and/or on the number of nodes forwhich metadata has to be generated at the data center) in at least someembodiments. In one embodiment, if an availability container (such as203A) comprises N data centers, and the performance requirements forbandwidth management can be met by fewer than N NCSs, some data centersneed not have any NCSs configured—instead, a single NCS may suffice formore than one data center. In other embodiments, a given NCS 180 may beconfigured to generate metadata for nodes at more than one availabilitycontainer.

The number and placement of the NCSs 180 may be determined by anetworking configuration service manager 222 in the depicted embodiment.The NCS manager 222 may itself comprise a plurality of hardware and/orsoftware components in some implementations, some of which may bedistributed across the data centers 205 of various availability zones203. Configuration changes for the NCSs 180 may be initiated by the NCSmanager as needed in the depicted embodiment—e.g., when a new version ofa software module used by NCSs is to be deployed, the deployments may beorchestrated by the NCS manager.

A number of other services of the provider network may interact with thenetworking configuration system in the depicted embodiment. For example,a unified console service 278 may implement one or more programmaticinterfaces 240 (such as web pages, APIs, GUIs, and/or command-linetools) enabling clients 265 to submit queries regarding networkingstatus of resources of interest and to receive the requested informationprogrammatically. The unified console service 278 may represent oneexample of a consolidated network view generator 152 of FIG. 1.Programmatic interfaces 240 may also enable clients to submitconfiguration requests—e.g., to raise or lower currently applicablebandwidth limits on various service instances or instance hosts forspecified time periods.

A device health management service 276 may be implemented at theprovider network 202, to collect (e.g., using a heartbeat mechanism)responsiveness information from various instance hosts and networkdevices in some embodiments. In the depicted embodiment, the healthmanagement service 276 may also be used for the collection ofnetworking-related metrics to be used as input by the NCSs 180, e.g., bypiggybacking networking metrics on health status messages. Thus, nodesof the health management service 276 may be considered examples ofmetrics collectors 125 illustrated in FIG. 1 The health managementservice may also be used as a metadata distribution system 127 in someembodiments—e.g., heartbeat messages sent to various instance hosts mayinclude piggybacked classification metadata. A DDOS detection service274 may be configured to detect denial of service attacks at targetswithin the provider network and/or denial of service attacks that mayhave been initiated from within the provider network 202 at externaltargets, e.g., by detecting unusual heavy traffic patterns to or from agiven set of IP addresses. When a potential DOS attack is identified,the DDOS detection service 274 may provide inputs to the appropriateNCSs 180 regarding potential network attacks or intrusions, which maylead the NCSs 180 to throttle bandwidth limits or change othernetworking configuration options at least temporarily for some instancehosts or network devices in an effort to mitigate the effects of thepotential attack. An instance placement service 272 may obtain thelatest available networking-related metrics and configuration settingsfrom the NCSs 180 to select instance hosts with sufficient sparebandwidth available for launching new instances, or to select instancehosts to which existing instance should be moved in view of changingnetwork traffic conditions.

Classification Metadata Usage at Instance Hosts

As described above, networking configuration servers may transmitrepresentations of traffic classification metadata to instance hosts ofvarious network-accessible services in different embodiments. FIG. 3illustrates an example of a networking manager module capable ofinterpreting traffic classification metadata at an instance host 144 ofa virtualized computing service, according to at least some embodiments.The instance host 144 may include a virtualization management softwarestack (VMSS) 310 capable of instantiating and managing a number ofdifferent client-accessible virtual machines or compute instances 350,such as compute instances 350A and 350B. The VMSS 310 may comprise, forexample, a hypervisor 317 and an administrative instance of an operatingsystem 315, which may be termed a “domain-zero” or “dom0” operatingsystem in some implementations. The dom0 operating system may not beaccessible by clients on whose behalf the compute instances 350 run, butmay instead be responsible for various administrative or control-planeoperations of the virtualized operating system, including handling thenetwork traffic directed to or from the compute instances 350.

In the depicted embodiment, the dom0 operating system 315 may include avariety of control modules including a networking manager component 357that in turn comprises a classification metadata interpreter module 359.The networking manager component may receive the classification metadatagenerated by an NCS 180 for instance host 144, for example, includingthe representations of the classification tree and/or the classificationprocedure described above. The interpreter 359 may parse the metadataand apply the procedure indicated in the metadata to packets of trafficdirected to or from the various compute instances 350. For example, inorder to implement bandwidth limits for various traffic categories, oneor more instance packet queues (IPQs) 319 (e.g., IPQs 319A and 319B) maybe configured. If the incoming or outgoing traffic rate of a particularcategory at a particular instance 350 exceeds the bandwidth limit forthat category during a given time interval, some of the incoming oroutgoing packets may be queued in an IPQ 319 for that particularinstance. In some implementations, more than one packet queue may beinstantiated for a given compute instance, e.g., one packet queue pertraffic category may be set up. In other implementations, a singlepacket queue may suffice for queuing packets associated with multipleinstances 350. IPQs or other similar constructs may also be used toimplement other networking configuration options in accordance withmetadata received from NCSs in various embodiments, such as latencyrequirements, other quality-of-service goals (e.g., relative prioritiesof network transmissions for different traffic categories), packetfragmentation settings, or settings dependent upon packet size.

As shown, each compute instance 350 may comprise a correspondingclient-accessible operating system 370 in the depicted embodiment, suchas OS 370A of compute instance 350A and OS 370B of compute instance350B. The operating systems 370 may each comprise their own networkingstacks 372 (e.g., networking stack 372A of instance 350A and networkingstack 372B of instance 350B), which may communicate with the networkingmanager 357 to use the hardware network interfaces of the instance host144 for incoming and outgoing traffic. From the perspective of theclients on whose behalf the compute instances 350 are implemented, eachinstance may appear to be a fully functional server, and the clients maynot be aware of the details of the implementation of the networkingconfiguration techniques being used (such as the queuing of packets atthe IPQs). It is noted that techniques for interpreting and usingclassification metadata similar to those illustrated in FIG. 3 may beused for instance hosts of other types of network-accessiblevirtualization services as well in different embodiments, such asvarious types of storage services or database services. It is also notedthat in some embodiments, the classification metadata may be interpretedand/or used at least in part at the networking stacks 372 of theinstances 350, instead of or in addition to at networking manager 357 ofVMSS 310.

Metadata Transmission Modes

Representations of the metadata generated by the NCSs 180 may beprovided to targets such as instance hosts 144 or networking devices 145in accordance with different protocols or transfer modes in differentembodiments. FIG. 4a-4c illustrate respective examples of protocols thatmay be used to transmit traffic classification metadata to an instancehost, according to at least some embodiments. One or more programmaticinterfaces may be used to provide the metadata to instance hosts or toother nodes of a distributed system in different embodiments, witheither the NCS or the receiver of the metadata invoking the interfacesin accordance with the protocol being used.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 4a , classification metadata may be sentto instance hosts 144 (or to network devices 145 or storage devices) viascheduled “push” operations 401 initiated by the NCS 180. For example,each NCS may be configured with a respective schedule according to whichthe NCS is to send metadata to a given metadata target (e.g., once everyminute, or once every five minutes). The actual times at which themetadata is sent in some implementations to different targets from agiven NCS may be staggered to avoid network congestion caused by themetadata transfer itself. For example, if the metadata is to be pushedonce every minute to six instance hosts from a given NCS, the metadatatransmission to each of the instance hosts may be scheduled ten secondsapart

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 4b , triggering events may lead tometadata being transmitted. For example, an event detector 421 maynotify the NCS that an event such as a potential DDOS detection has beendetected, and the NCS may then generate appropriate metadata to mitigateeffects of the event. For certain types of events, the triggered push402 of the generated metadata may be initiated at a high priority assoon as the metadata is generated in some embodiments, in an attempt torespond as quickly as possible to the event. For other types oftriggering events, e.g., if an administrator submits a request tooverride previously-generated metadata, the metadata need not be pushedimmediately or at a high priority.

In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 4c , the instance host 144 may submita pull request 403 to the BA 180 for the most recent classificationmetadata, and the metadata may accordingly be sent to the instance hostin the response 404. In various embodiments, combinations of any of thethree approaches illustrated in FIG. 4a-4c may be used, either forinstance hosts 144, for network devices 145, or for storage devices. Inat least one embodiment, a differential approach may be used whentransmitting metadata—that is, a representation of only the differencesbetween the current metadata and the most-recently provided metadata maybe sent to an instance host, network device or storage device. In otherembodiments, the entire metadata may be transmitted in each transfer.

Classification Trees

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a classification tree data structure501 that may be used to represent network traffic categories fornetworking configuration at a device of a distributed system, accordingto at least some embodiments. Each node of the tree 501 may have anassociated set of networking configuration options or settings, such asthe respective bandwidth limit illustrated for each node in FIG. 5, forthe category represented by the node. Other examples of networkingconfiguration options that may apply to each node may include packetlatency requirements or goals, other quality-of-service goals such asrelative prioritization of different traffic categories, packetfragmentation/reassembly settings, or configuration settings dependentupon packet size. Traffic categories may be defined based on differencesin a variety of properties in different embodiments—e.g., based on thecategory of application associated with the traffic, the services whosecomponents are at the sending or receiving end, the network addresses ofthe endpoints involved (which may themselves be indicative ofapplication type in some cases), the sizes of the transfers, the clientson whose behalf the traffic is generated, the locations of the endpointsrelative to each other (e.g., whether, for an outgoing packet from aprovider network node, the destination is within the local data center,the local availability container, the local region, another region ofthe provider network, or external to the provider network) and so on. Inthe illustrated classification tree 501, for example, node 504represents traffic for one class of applications (high performancecomputing), node 520 represents database traffic, and node 506represents high-performance block storage traffic (i.e., trafficassociated with block storage devices that are configured to supporthigh input/output rates). Within the database category represented bynode 520, three nodes for location-based sub-categories are defined:node 522 for intra-data-center traffic, node 524 for intra-regiontraffic, and node 526 for extra-region traffic.

In embodiments in which the networking configuration options defined forvarious categories include bandwidth limits, traffic summation policiesor rules of various kinds may apply to the classification tree,governing the relationships between the bandwidth limits of child nodesrelative to parent nodes. In the illustrated example, the followingrules may apply: (a) no child node in the tree may have a bandwidthlimit exceeding the bandwidth limit of its parent, and (b) although thesum of the bandwidth limits of the children nodes of a parent node mayexceed the bandwidth limit of the parent, during any given time periodthe sum of the actual traffic rates for the categories represented bythe children nodes may not exceed the bandwidth limit of the parent.

In accordance with these rules, since the root node (collectivelyrepresenting all the traffic categories defined for the instance host ornetwork device for which the classification graph is generated) has abandwidth limit of K Gbit/sec, none of the children nodes of the rootnode may have a greater bandwidth limit than K Gbit/sec; thus, A<K, B<K,C<K, and D<K. In the case of node 520, the bandwidth limits of thechildren nodes (nodes 522, 525 and 526) have been assigned to sum up tothe bandwidth limit of the parent node, and so both rules stated aboveare satisfied. In the case of node 530, representing a generic “other”traffic category with a bandwidth limit of D Gbit/sec, the child nodes532 (other block-storage traffic), 534 (Internet traffic), 536(Intra-service traffic) and 538 (miscellaneous or unclassified trafficthat is not represented by any other leaf node) each also have abandwidth limit of D Gbit/sec. Such a scenario, in which the sum of thenominal bandwidth limits for children nodes (4D Gbit/sec in this case)exceeds the bandwidth limit of the parent node (D Gbit/sec), may beinterpreted as follows in accordance with the second rule listed above.Even though in principle each of the categories of the children nodescan have traffic rates of up to D Gbit/sec, in practice, during anygiven second (or other appropriate time unit), the sum of the actualtraffic flows of all the child nodes is not to exceed D Gbit/sec. Thus,if the traffic rate for the category “other block-storage traffic” (node532) is 0.6D Gbit/sec during a particular second, the traffic rates fornodes 534, 536 and 538 combined may not be allowed to exceed 0.4D.

Respective trees may be generated by an NCS 180 for incoming andoutgoing traffic at a given instance host or network device in someembodiments, and the tree for incoming traffic may differ from the treefor outgoing traffic in the networking configuration options and/or thecategories. In some embodiments, for some or all nodes of aclassification tree, different limits may be defined for sustainedbandwidth (to be applied to average bandwidth usage over time periodsexceeding T seconds, for example), and for burst bandwidth (e.g., ashort term burst traffic rate of 4 Gbit/sec may be allowed for up to 2seconds for a given instance host, even though the sustained bandwidthlimit for that instance host is set to 1 Gbit/sec). As noted earlier, insome implementations, the traffic classification hierarchy for a giveninstance host, network device or storage device may be flat instead ofcomprising multiple layers.

In some scenarios, it may be useful from an administrative perspectiveto combine the classification trees of different entities of adistributed system into higher-order trees. FIG. 6 illustrates anexample of a hierarchical data structure 601 that may be used to combinenetwork traffic category information of a plurality of instance hosts ata data center, according to at least some embodiments. As shown,respective classification trees (C-trees) may be generated for numerousinstance hosts at the data center, such as C-trees 601A, 601B, 601M and601N. The data center may comprise a plurality of server racks arrangedin a number of different rooms in the depicted embodiment. An NCS mayaggregate the C-trees of the instance hosts incorporated in a givenrack, forming rack-level C-trees such as 603A and 603B. At the nextlevel of aggregation, the rack-level C-trees 603 for all the racks in agiven room or subset of the data center may be combined, e.g., in theform of room-level C-trees 605A or 605B. A single composite tree 607 maybe created for the data center as a whole in some embodiments, bycombining the room-level trees. Higher-level tree hierarchies, such asat the level of availability containers, geographical regions, or aprovider network as a whole may be constructed in some embodiments.

Such composite tree hierarchies may help the networking configurationsystem and the administrators of the provider network in a number ofways, especially in implementations in which customizable visualrepresentations of the hierarchies are made available programmatically(e.g., via a unified console service). An overview of the uniformity ornon-uniformity of bandwidth usage at different parts of the data centeror provider network may be obtained using such hierarchies, which may inturn lead to configuration or placement changes to improve or balancenetwork utilization levels. The distribution of available bandwidthamong different categories of traffic may also become clearer when suchhigher-level hierarchies are examined, which may in turn be helpful inmaking pricing changes (e.g., an increase in the pricing of trafficrelated to more popular categories) that help improve the providernetwork's revenue. Placement services may also benefit from higher-leveltree hierarchies, e.g., by determining rack-level bandwidth usage whichmay help in selecting appropriate instance hosts for new serviceinstances.

Classification Procedure Graphs

As described above, in at least some embodiments a networkingconfiguration server may determine the steps or rules of a procedurethat can be used to classify network traffic units such as packets intothe categories defined for a given instance host or network device. FIG.7 illustrates an example of a traffic procedure graph 750 that may beused together with a classification tree to determine the category of aunit of network traffic, according to at least some embodiments. Such agraph 750 may comprise a plurality of decision nodes in each of which arespective set of classification criteria for network traffic areindicated. In at least some embodiments, at least a subset of thedecision nodes may be arranged in a sequence in which successive nodesof the sequence correspond to successively narrower categories. Forexample, in the sequence of nodes 701, 702 and 703, a subset of trafficthat matches criteria indicated in node 701 may match the criteriaindicated in node 702, and a subset of traffic that matches criteriaindicated in node 702 may match criteria indicated in node 703. If agiven unit of network traffic ends up not matching the criterion of thelast node of the sequence, that traffic unit may have to be evaluatedusing a different sequence—e.g., if a packet does match the criteria ofnodes 701 and 702 (as indicated by “yes” results with respect to nodes701 and 702) but does not match the criteria indicated in node 703 (asindicated by a “no” result with respect to node 703), the packet maythen have to be evaluated using the sequence of nodes 704 and 705.

In general, if a given traffic unit matches all the criteria of a givensequence of nodes, its category may be determined—e.g., it may beclassified as a category C1 packet if the criteria of nodes 701, 702 and703 are met, as a category C6 packet if the criteria of nodes 707 and708 are met, as a category C5 packet if the criteria of node 706 aremet, or as a category C7 packet if the criteria of node 709 are met. Thecriteria indicated in a given node may be expressed in terms of variousproperties of the network traffic unit in different embodiments. Forexample, the contents of one or more headers of a packet, such as thesource or destination IP address, port numbers, or the networkingprotocol being used may be used to determine its category, or contentsof the body may be used. Each of the categories into which a giventraffic unit may be classified using the procedure may correspond to acorresponding node of a classification tree also generated by the NCS inthe depicted embodiment.

At least in principle, arbitrarily fine-grained criteria may be used forpacket classification in at least some embodiments, and arbitrarily longsequences of decision nodes may be generated. For example, theclassification criteria may be based on very specific contents of thepacket bodies (e.g., whether a particular byte range “0xff” occurs atoffset O1 of a packet), or on arbitrary combinations of packet or headercontents, and so on. In order to reduce the size and complexity of theclassification procedure graphs 750, decision nodes with multiplepossible outcomes may be used in some embodiments. For example, inprocedure graph 750, node 705 comprising lookup table 770 is included.Each such lookup table may comprise a plurality of rows from which onemay be indexed or selected on the basis of a property of a given trafficunit (such as a packet's destination IP address) to arrive at aclassification decision. In the example of node 705, the classificationdecision is whether the packet belongs to category C2, C3 or C4. Inother cases, the classification decision may be to evaluate the packetusing an additional sequence of decision nodes—e.g., the lookup tableentries may serve as pointers to other classification graphs orsub-graphs.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example of a use of a lookup-table node 805 of atraffic classification procedure graph, according to at least someembodiments. In the depicted embodiment, a hash function 850 may beapplied to a portion of a network packet 810 to identify the entry ofthe lookup table 770A of node 805 that is to be used to categorize thepacket. The lookup table node 805 may itself have been reached after anevaluation of other decision nodes of the procedure in some cases, i.e.,at least some level of categorization may already have been made forpacket 810 prior to the application of the hash function 850. The packetin the depicted example is an outbound packet with a destination IPaddress “P.Q.R.S” 801, and the third element “R” of the four elements ofthe destination IP address is used as an input to the hash function 850to determine the lookup table entry corresponding to the packet 810. Anyof several properties of a packet 810 may be used as input to such ahash function in various embodiments, including for example values ofother parts of the destination IP address or the source IP address,values of other header fields 802, or even contents of the body 803 ofthe packet. Rules regarding which properties of the packets are to beused to select lookup table entries, and the function (such as hashfunction 850) to be applied to the properties, may be provided togetherwith the classification metadata by a NCS 180 to a control module at atarget device such as an instance host or a network device in someembodiments.

In some cases, a lookup table entry that is selected (e.g., as a resultof the hashing of the destination IP address element) may directlyindicate a traffic category of the corresponding packet. For example, aselection of one of the elements of the lookup table 770A leads to thecategory A in FIG. 8. Other entries of the lookup table may themselvesserve as pointers to additional procedure graphs, such as graphs 880Aand 880B of FIG. 8, whose decision nodes may have to be navigated inorder to determine the category of the packet 810. Such additionalprocedure graphs that are reached as a result of criteria evaluated froma node of a different graph may also be referred to as sub-graphsherein. In the depicted example, criteria indicated by decision nodes851, 852 (itself a node comprising a lookup table 770B), and/or 853 mayneed to be evaluated if the hash function 850 leads to one entry of770A, while criteria indicated by decision nodes 854, 855 and/or 856 mayhave to be evaluated if the hash function 850 results in a selection ofa different entry of lookup table 770A. If procedure graph 880B isreached, and the criteria indicated in elements 854 and 855 are met, forexample, the packet 810 may be deemed to belong to traffic category L inthe example of FIG. 8. The incorporation of lookup tables 770 intovarious nodes of classification procedure graphs 750 may allow fairlycompact representations of traffic classification logic, even whencomplex fine-grained logic is used for the classification.

Responsiveness of Networking Configuration System to Triggering Events

In some embodiments, as described earlier, bandwidth managementdecisions may be made in response to events such as the detection ofpotentially damaging events, such as network attacks or intrusions. Oneof the factors that may be taken into account when configuringnetworking configuration systems, e.g., when deciding how many NCSsshould be set up in a particular subset of a distributed system, or whattypes of computing capabilities and metadata distribution capabilitiesare required for a networking configuration system, may be the desiredresponsiveness to such events. FIG. 9 illustrates an example of aresponsiveness metric that may be utilized to determine values for oneor more parameters of a networking configuration service, according toat least some embodiments.

An example timeline is shown in FIG. 9, in which the time valueincreases from the left to the right. At time T1, as indicated by block902, a security service of a distributed system for which centralizednetworking configuration is being implemented detects a potentialnetwork attack, such as a DDOS attack. The possible attack may beidentified based on sudden increases in traffic rates directed to orfrom one or more nodes of the distributed system, for example. Such anattack may be directed at one or more targets within the distributedsystem (such as a web site of an e-business that is being implementedusing a set of compute instances of a provider network), or external tothe distributed system (e.g., repeated requests may be sent at highrates from a set of compute instances of a provider network to anexternal web site). In some cases, the increase in traffic may be forlegitimate reasons, such as a sudden burst of interest in a productgoing on sale at a web site; however, in many embodiments, the securityservice may employ sophisticated analysis techniques to reduce theprobability of such false positives.

Regardless of whether the potential attack is really an attack or not,the networking configuration system may be configured to respond in thedepicted embodiment, e.g., by generating new classification metadataand/or new configuration options such as bandwidth limits for theappropriate nodes of the distributed system, and applying the newmetadata as quickly as possible. As indicated by block 904, modifiedmetadata for a set of nodes may be generated at time T2 in the depictedtimeline. For example, if traffic that may represent an outbound DDOSattack originating from an IP address K.L.M.N and directed at an IPaddress E.F.G.H is detected, the NCSs responsible for applying bandwidthlimits for those IP addresses may generate the new metadata. The newmetadata may, for example, simply impose new bandwidth limits (at leasttemporarily) on all traffic emanating from K.L.M.N or received atE.F.G.H. Alternatively, one or more new traffic categories may bedefined, specifically for traffic flowing from K.L.M.N to E.F.G.H, andbandwidth limits for those specific categories may be generated anddisseminated.

The modified classification metadata may be distributed to theappropriate instance hosts or other nodes, and may be put into effect attime T3 in the example timeline of FIG. 9, as indicated by block 906.(At some later time, the classification metadata may be modified again,e.g., if the network attack is ended or if the traffic that appeared toindicate the attack was found to be legitimate.) The responsiveness ofthe networking configuration service to such triggering events, asindicated for example by the interval (T3−T1), may be tracked over time,e.g., by the networking configuration service manager 222, and may beused to adjust the number of NCSs employed, or various properties of themetadata distribution system.

Methods Implementing a Centralized Networking Configuration Service

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating aspects of operations that may beperformed to configure and initialize components of a networkingconfiguration service, according to at least some embodiments. As shownin element 1001, various initial or default parameters of the servicemay be determined, e.g., in view of global bandwidth managementpolicies, availability and/or performance requirements of the servicefor which the networking configuration is being implemented. Suchparameters may include, for example, the number of NCSs 180 to beconfigured in each availability container or in each data center, themetadata delivery schedules and protocols (e.g., whether a push protocolin which the NCSs initiate metadata transfer is to be used as thedefault, or whether a pull protocol is to be used in which instancehosts request classification metadata as needed), the types ofadditional triggering events that may lead to metadata transfer, theinput sources to the NCSs and/or the output destinations to whichresults of the NCS decisions are to be supplied.

In at least some embodiments, a set of programmatic interfaces may beimplemented (element 1004), enabling clients and/or administrators toselectively override the decisions of the NCSs. For example, in oneembodiments, some clients may be allowed to submit requests to increasevarious bandwidth limits above those selected by the NCSs (e.g., basedon forecast increases in application workload levels), or to submitrequests to cap bandwidth limits for certain categories of traffic belowthose that the NCSs may determine (e.g., in an effort to reducetraffic-related billing costs). Configuration requests from clients/andor administrators for various other types of options may also besupported, such as for latency-related settings, quality-of-servicesettings, and so on.

The appropriate number of NCSs 180 may be instantiated at selectedlocations (element 1007) in accordance with the parameters determined inoperations corresponding to element 1001. Network connectivity may beestablished between the NCSs and various other elements of thedistributed system or provider network (element 1010)—e.g., between theNCSs and the instance hosts 144 and other network devices 145 at whichthe decisions made by the NCSs are to be put into effect, between theNCSs and the input data sources influencing the NCS decisions, andbetween the NCSs and any output destinations that are interested inobtaining networking information from the NCSs on an ongoing basis. Inat least some embodiments, secure networking protocols such as TLS(Transport Layer Security), SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) may be used forthe network connections between the NCSs and at least some of the otherelements of the distributed system.

FIG. 11 is a flow diagram illustrating aspects of operations that may beperformed to generate and distribute traffic classification metadata ofa networking configuration service, according to at least someembodiments. In the depicted embodiment, an NCS may employ an iterativeapproach, in which during each iteration a set of inputs is used todetermine networking management parameters that are distributed to andapplied at a set of target nodes (e.g., instance hosts), and metrics arethen collected from the target nodes and other sources to be fed back asinputs to influence or determine the parameters for the next iteration.As shown in element 1101, a given NCS may receive, during a given timeinterval, a set of network-related metrics obtained from various nodesof the distributed system such as instance hosts and/or networkingdevices such as switches, routers, gateways and the like. Such metrics,which may for example include measured incoming and outgoing trafficrates, packet loss rates, packet throttling rates, and so on, may beused to generate the next iteration of traffic classification metadataby the NCS. In some cases the metrics may be provided to the NCS via thenodes of a metrics collection system, such as nodes of a healthmonitoring service, for example. In addition, the NCS may also obtainvarious inputs from other input sources in the depicted embodiment,including security-related services, per-IP-address traffic aggregators,per-client traffic aggregators, and the like. Clients and/oradministrators may also submit configuration requests to the NCS, suchas requests to increase or decrease the bandwidth limits previouslyapplied to one or more traffic categories by the NCS, and suchconfiguration requests may also be used as input when determining thenext iteration of traffic classification metadata.

At the NCS, the metrics and received inputs may be used to determinetraffic classification metadata in the depicted embodiment (element1104), e.g., in view of global and/or local networking managementpolicies. Global policies may indicate, for example, target utilizationlimits of various parts of the networking infrastructure, fairnessrequirements for dealing with traffic from different clients that havesigned up for similar levels of service, relative priorities to be givento network traffic for different network-accessible services beingimplemented, and so on. Local policies may indicate rules that apply ata given availability container or at a given data center whosenetworking infrastructure and capabilities may differ from those ofother availability containers or data centers, for example. Theclassification metadata generated for a given target node of thedistributed system may include a traffic classification hierarchy to beused at the target node (e.g., a hierarchy that can be represented in atree data structure similar to that shown in FIG. 5), and a procedure ora set of rules to be used to classify units of network traffic into thecategories defined in the hierarchy (e.g., a procedure representableusing a graph similar to that shown in FIG. 7). For each trafficcategory defined in the hierarchy, one or more corresponding networkingconfiguration options such as bandwidth limits may also be determined,such as a bandwidth limit defined for the average traffic and adifferent bandwidth limit defined for short-term bursts, latencyrequirements, packet-size dependent requirements, or priority settings.In some cases, respective sets of categories and/or options may bedefined for incoming and outgoing traffic. At least in some embodiments,the classification hierarchies and/or the procedures may be customizedfor different instance hosts and/or network devices—e.g., a given hostH1 that is being used for one set of client applications may havedifferent traffic categories defined and different bandwidth limitsimposed on those categories than another host H2 at which a differentset of client applications is being implemented.

Respective portable representations or encodings of the trafficclassification hierarchy and the classification procedure may begenerated at the NCS in the depicted embodiment for transmission to thetarget nodes (element 1107). An industry standard protocol or languagesuch as JSON, XML, YAML, or the like may be used in someimplementations, while a proprietary encoding scheme may be used inother implementations. The portable representations may be transmittedto the targets where the metadata is to be applied or used (element1110). In at least one implementation, a single or combined encoding maybe used for both the classification categories and the procedure, whilein other implementations, respective separate representations of theclassification categories and the procedures may be used. In someembodiments, a differential metadata transmission technique may be used,in which for example only that portion of the metadata which has changedsince the previous iteration is sent to the target. In otherembodiments, a full transmission approach may be used, in which theentire metadata may be transmitted in each iteration. In variousembodiments, combinations of scheduled push transmissions (in which themetadata is pushed at the initiative of the NCS to the targets), pulltransmissions (in which the NCS transmits the classification metadata inresponse to a request from the target) and event-triggered metadatatransmissions (in which the detection of certain types of events leadsthe NCS to generate and/or transmit the metadata) may be used. After themetadata for a given iteration has been sent to the appropriatetarget(s), the NCS may begin its next iteration, e.g., by repeatingoperations corresponding to elements 1101 onwards.

At the target nodes of the distributed system, control modules (such asthe networking manager 357 shown in FIG. 3) may be configured receiveand interpret the metadata representations. The metadata may be used toclassify units of network traffic such as packets, and to apply thecorresponding bandwidth limits to schedule and/or throttle thetransmissions of the traffic units (element 1113). In someimplementations, operating system utilities or tools such as “tc” thatare already available on the node may be used to implement the logicgenerated by the NCS. In other implementations, custom tools orutilities may be used. Metrics may be collected from the target nodes,e.g., using various performance tools and the like, and used as inputsto the NCS.

FIG. 12 is a flow diagram illustrating aspects of operations that may beperformed to change networking management parameters in response totriggering events, according to at least some embodiments. As shown inelement 1201, an event that may result in a modification to trafficclassification metadata, such as a potential DDOS attack, may bedetected. In some embodiments, a provider network may establish one ormore security services to identify suspicious traffic patterns thatindicate possible attacks of various kinds, and such a service maycommunicate with the networking configuration system. The specific nodesof the distributed system (e.g., instance hosts and/or network devicessuch as switches, routers and the like) that may be affected by, or maybe contributing to, the attack may be identified (element 1204) in thedepicted embodiment, e.g., either by such a security service, by theNCS, or by a combination of the security service and the NCS.

A modified set of traffic classification metadata may be generated atthe NCS to mitigate the effects of the attack (element 1207). Themodifications may include, for example, new categories of traffic beingdefined (e.g., based on the addresses of the specific nodes involved insending and/or receiving the suspect traffic), and/or new bandwidthlimits or other networking configuration options to be applied. The newmetadata may then be transmitted to a selected set of nodes of thedistributed system, which may include the specific nodes involved in ortargeted by the attack and/or other nodes (e.g., network devices thatare intermediaries along the path taken by the suspect traffic) in someembodiments.

The time taken to respond to the triggering condition, e.g., theinterval between the detection of the condition and the application ofthe new metadata, may be measured and recorded (element 1210). Overtime, trends in the responsiveness of the networking configurationsystem to such triggering events, and/or the effectiveness of theactions taken by the networking configuration system, may be analyzed todetermine whether configuration changes need to be made (element 1213).If the responsiveness is found to be inadequate, for example, any of anumber of configuration changes may be made: e.g., the number of NCSsmay be increased, the connectivity between the event detectors and theNCSs may be improved, the metadata distribution system may be enhanced,and/or the logic at the NCSs or the target nodes may be modified torespond more effectively to detected events.

FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating aspects of operations that may beperformed to provide a unified view of networking-related statusinformation to a client of a distributed system, according to at leastsome embodiments. As shown in element 1301, one or more programmaticinterfaces (such as web pages or consoles, APIs, GUIs or command-linetools) may be established for providing unified and customizable viewsof the networking status of various distributed system resources ofinterest to a client. For example, a client may have a large number ofcompute instances of a virtualized computing service assigned, and maywish to see which specific instances have been affected by bandwidththrottling in the last fifteen minutes. The programmatic interface(s)may enable the client to use various filters to specify the networkingproperties to be displayed and/or the set of resources for which theproperties are to be displayed.

A networking status request may be received via such an interface,indicating the metrics and resources of interest (element 1304). Thenetworking configuration system may retrieve the requested metrics,e.g., from a metrics database 190 (element 1307) or from a cache at aNCS. In some embodiments, the applicable classification metadata thatmay be useful in responding to the request may also be retrieved from aclassification database 192 (element 1310) or from a metadata cache at aNCS. Using the collected information, a response to the networkingstatus request may be generated and provided to the requester via theprogrammatic interface (element 1313).

Resource Usage Visualization Tools for Network Topologies

As described above, the networking configuration service may collect avariety of metrics from various components of a distributed system suchas a provider network, and use such metrics to determine settings suchas bandwidth limits for at least some nodes. In at least one embodiment,one or more visualization tools capable of displaying performanceindicators or resource usage indicators (such as color-codedrepresentations or heat maps of the ratios between the respectivemeasured network traffic rate at various nodes and the respectivebandwidth limits set for those nodes) may be implemented. According toone embodiment, a network topology visualization server configured toprovide such resource heat maps and/or other types of visualizations maybe implemented as a subcomponent of a networking configuration server180. In other embodiments, such a network topology visualization toolmay be implemented independently of the networking configuration server180, e.g., as another centralized service of the distributed system, oras a standalone entity, and may interact with an NCS 180 or consume datacollected by an NCS 180. In at least some implementations, aconsolidated networking view generator 152 (shown in FIG. 1) may includea topology visualization interface as one of its features.

A centralized topology visualization server (TVS) may be configured todetermine logical and/or physical relationships between various nodes ofa distributed system in at least some embodiments. For example, in anembodiment in which a virtual computing service is implemented, the TVSmay determine the client accounts to which various compute instances ata set of instance hosts are assigned, and may use the accountinformation to generate a topology that includes only those computeinstances that are assigned to a particular client account, or to aselected set of client accounts. In response to a visualization requestfrom a client affiliated with that client account (or set of accounts),a heat map showing performance indicators for the instances of thattopology may then be provided. For an administrator ofnetwork-accessible service being implemented at one or more datacenters, a more detailed topology may be generated, which may indicatethe physical or logical network links between various instances, hostsand/or network devices such as switches, routers and the like, and acorresponding heat map may be generated using information that would nottypically be made accessible to a non-administrative client of theservice. In each case, using the heat map generated, the client oradministrator may be provided an easy-to-understand visualrepresentation of various types of resource usage statistics. The usagestatistics may then be used, for example, to proactively identifypotential bottlenecks or other types of problems and take responsiveactions. The range of colors displayed in the heat map, and thetransition boundaries between colors, may be selectable to indicate thelevel of the metric being indicated. For example, in one implementation,a red color may be displayed for a given node of a network topology toindicate that the recently measured traffic rate is very close to thebandwidth limit for that node, while a green color may be used toindicate that the measured traffic is well below the limit, andtransitional colors from red to green may be used for intermediatelevels of traffic.

According to some embodiments, the a TVS may thus be responsible forobtaining metrics collection from a variety of sources in thedistributed system, obtaining relationship information for variouscomponents of the distributed system, and determining performanceindicators (such as individual performance metrics, or ratios of metricsto applicable limits) for the various types of network topologies basedon the metrics and the relationship information collected. Programmaticvisualization interfaces enabling clients or administrators to requestcustomized or filtered visualizations of resource performance indicatorsmay be implemented, and the TVS may respond to visualization requests bysynthesizing heat maps and/or other graphical representations of theperformance indicators using appropriate subsets of the data set. Insome implementations, one or more of these tasks may involveinteractions with other components or services of a distributed system,as described below in further detail.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of a customizable heat map 1450 that maybe generated by a topology visualization server (TVS) 1410 for at leasta subset of the nodes of a distributed system, according to at leastsome embodiments. In the depicted embodiment, the TVS is implemented asa constituent element of a networking configuration server 180. In otherembodiments, a TVS 1410 may be implemented using one or more hardware orsoftware components independent of, or external to, an NCS; e.g., acentralized visualization service may be implemented in the absence ofan NCS in some such embodiments. TVS 1410 may obtain input from severaltypes of data sources in the embodiment shown in FIG. 14, including anaccount management service 1420, a placement service 151, an inventoryservice 1430, as well as metrics collectors 125.

Account management service 1420 may provide information to TVS 1410regarding the client accounts (and/or affiliated user or group accounts)to which various service instances of one or more multi-tenant orsingle-tenant service instances (e.g., a virtualized computing service,a storage service, or a database service) are assigned. Placementservice 151, as described earlier, may be responsible for identifyingthe instance hosts at which various service instances are launched, andmay thus be able to provide instance-to-host mappings in at least someembodiments that may be helpful in generating network topologies. Aninventory service 1430 may manage a database that records where withinone or more data centers, various instance hosts, switches, routers, andother equipment components of the distributed system are physicallylocated. Metrics collectors 125, as also described earlier in thecontext of FIG. 1, may gather networking-related and/or other resourcemetrics from various service instances, hosts, networking devices andthe like within the distributed system. For example, fornetworking-related metrics, the sources may include, among others, (a)network interface cards, (b) networking components of virtualizationsoftware stacks installed at virtualization hosts, (c) networkingcomponents of compute instances, (d) network tap devices, (e) switches,(f) routers, (g) gateways, or (h) load balancers. It is noted that notall the various types of data sources shown in FIG. 14 may be used byTVS 1410 in some embodiments—e.g., a placement service may in someimplementations be capable of providing physical location informationregarding various nodes, so interactions with an inventory managementservice may not be required in such implementations.

Data collected from these various sources may be synthesized by the TVS1410 to generate various customizable heat maps in response tovisualization requests, such as the example heat map 1450. Heat map 1450shows a network topology 1460 comprising five compute instances (CIs)assigned to a client account CA1—CIs 1440A, 1440B and 1440C inavailability container 203A, and CIs 1440D and 1440E in availabilitycontainer 203B. The topologies generated by the TVS 1410 may in somecases span data center boundaries, availability container boundaries (asin FIG. 14), or other organizational or physical boundaries in variousembodiments. For each compute instance 1440 in the topology 1460, arespective color-coded performance indicator (PI) 1470 isdisplayed—e.g., PIs 1470A, 1470B, 1470C, 1470D and 1470E are shown forCIs 1440A, 1440B, 1440C, 1440D and 1440E respectively. The PIs 1470 mayindicate various different types of metrics, or ratios associated withmetrics, in different embodiments, and the type of performanceinformation encoded may be customizable in at least someimplementations. For example, a ratio of a measured traffic rate to acurrently-configured bandwidth limit, for incoming and/or outgoingtraffic, may be displayed. In such an example scenario, a red PI mayindicate that the measured traffic is close to (e.g., over 75% of) thebandwidth limit, a green PI may indicate that the ratio is below 30%,and a yellow PI may indicate that the ratio is between 30% and 75%. Insome implementations, a numerical value or a textual message may also beshown for each node (e.g., the ratio value may be displayed as apercentage). A number of different types of performance indicators maybe displayed by the TVS in different embodiments, including networkbandwidth-related indicators, latency-related indicators (e.g., howclose recently-measured latencies are to an upper bound requested forpacket latency, or a ratio between measured average packet transferlatency and a target upper bound on latency), CPU utilization levelsrelative to a threshold, storage device utilization levels, memoryutilization levels, and so on. In some embodiments, in addition toinstead of ratios being indicated in the heat map (e.g., the ratio of ameasured value to some defined threshold), absolute values may beindicated. In at least some implementations, the heat map may bedisplayed by a client-side component (such as a web browser or a GUItool) based on information provided by the visualization service. Thus,the visualization service may be responsible in such implementations forobtaining the metrics, determining the topology and the performanceindicators, and providing a selected set of data for inclusion in a heatmap in some appropriate format to a client-side component. Theclient-side component may then display the heat map using the dataprovided by the visualization service. In at least some embodiments, thevisualization service may comprise both back-end and front-endcomponents, with the back-end components responsible for the generationof the underlying data that can be presented in the form of heat maps,and the front-end components responsible for the actual display of theheat maps.

According to some embodiments, users of the TVS 1410 may be able toadjust the granularity of the information displayed in thevisualizations. For example, in one implementation, with respect tonetworking-related performance indicators, a client may indicate apreference for any of the following granularities: (a) a port-levelgranularity (e.g., information at the level of TCP or UDP ports may bepreferred), (b) a network-interface level granularity, (c) a virtualmachine level granularity, (d) a host-level granularity, (e) arack-level granularity, (f) a data center room-level granularity, (g) adata-center level granularity, (h) an availability container-levelgranularity, or (i) a geographical region level granularity. Granularitychoices may also be selected for other types of resources or metrics forwhich performance indicators may be displayed in various embodiments,such as storage related metrics. The TVS 1410 may aggregate metricscollected at the requested granularity to determine the performanceindicators to be included in the visualization or display. In additionto customizing the granularity of the displayed networking-relatedinformation, in at least one embodiment the display may be customizedfor various traffic categories. For example, network traffic to or froma given node of a distributed system may be classified based on theendpoint IP addresses (e.g., whether the traffic is flowing between twoinstances within a provider network, or to a public Internet addressoutside the provider network), based on the client account to which anendpoint of the traffic is assigned, or based on the application orapplication type for which the traffic is generated (e.g., a heat mapspecific to database-related traffic may be requested, or a heat mapspecific to high-performance computing may be requested). Trafficclassifications such as those illustrated in FIG. 5 may be used in someembodiments to filter the information displayed. In at least someimplementations, clients of the TVS may programmatically define trafficcategories foe which they want performance indicators displayed. Forexample, a client may designate one set of its assigned computeinstances as a source set, and another set of instances or otherendpoints (e.g., a particular database instance) as a destination, andmay define a traffic category based on the designated sets.

In one embodiment, visualization requests may include a temporalcomponent—e.g., a request may indicate, for a specified type of metric,a time period for which the metrics are to be collected to generate thedisplayed performance indicators. In some embodiments, clients may beable to request dynamic visualizations, in which for example thevariation in the value of a given performance indicator over a specifiedtime period is to be indicated. The authorization capabilities or rolesassigned to the visualization requester (e.g., whether the requester hasadministrative access permissions with respect to a service, ornon-administrative access permissions), may also serve as an implicitfilter that controls the kind of information that can be displayed invarious embodiments. In some embodiments, a centralized visualizationservice may be usable for viewing resource metrics or performanceindicators pertaining to more than one network-accessible service, and aconsumer of the visualization may be able to indicate the services forwhich performance indicators are to be displayed. For example, a givenclient account of a provider network may use both a relational databaseservice and a non-relational database service implemented by theprovider network, and separate heat maps may be generated for respectivetopologies and related networking performance indicators for the twodifferent types of database services.

Different consumers of the topology visualization server may beauthorized to access different subsets of collected metrics, and hencemay be provided visualizations at different levels of detail in someembodiments. FIG. 15 illustrates examples of different subsets ofcollected metrics that may be used to generate heat maps for serviceadministrators and non-administrative clients of a service, according toat least some embodiments. As shown, the administrator-accessiblemetrics 1510 may be a super-set of metrics accessible bynon-administrative clients in the depicted embodiment. For example, inprovider networks in which various virtualized multi-tenant services areimplemented, such as a virtual computing service and one or morevirtualized storage services, information regarding the physicalresources being used to implement the virtualization (e.g., the instancehosts being used, the networking devices being used, the placement ofthe physical resources within various data centers) may be consideredconfidential for a number of reasons. Providing details such as thetypes of hardware processors and devices being used to the serviceclients may be contrary to one of the main goals of implementingvirtualized services: the ability of the clients to seamlessly utilizevarious service features without having to be concerned about hardwaredetails. However, administrators of the virtualized services may need toknow at least some details regarding the hardware being used, e.g., inorder to provision the appropriate number and types of hardware servers,racks, networking devices and the like. Accordingly, administrators maybe able to view more detailed heat maps generated by a TVS 1410 than areprovided to non-administrative clients in the depicted embodiment.

In some embodiments, the types of information exposed tonon-administrative clients may include service-instance levelperformance indicators, such as the ratio of the measured networktraffic to bandwidth limits for the instances assigned to a given clientaccount or a set of linked client accounts. A client account may beestablished in some embodiments at one or more network-accessibleservices of a provider network on behalf of an organization, such as aprivate-sector or a public-sector entity, or a department within such anentity. Each client account may encompass a number of different useraccounts or group accounts in some implementations. In at least someembodiments, different client accounts may be linked, e.g., for combinedbilling for two different departments of a large corporation that haveeach established respective client accounts. Some of the metricscollected by a TVS may be visible only to one client account (e.g., tousers/groups defined for that account), such as instance-related metrics1515B, which are accessible to client C2. Other metrics may be visibleto users/groups affiliated with a plurality of linked client accounts,such as instance-related metrics 1515A that are visible to clients C1and C2.

A number of metric types may not be accessible to non-administrativeusers in various embodiments. For example, metrics 1550 associated withspecific network devices such as switches, routers, gateways and thelike may typically not be exposed to non-administrators. Similarly,metrics collected for instance hosts (hardware computing devices thatpotentially implement service instances for a plurality of clients) mayalso be accessed only by administrators. In the depicted embodiment,metrics regarding data centers (e.g., the traffic amounts flowing in andout of specific data centers) may also be restricted for administrativeuse only.

Accordingly, the types of heat maps generated for different consumercategories by the TVS 1410 may differ. Client C1 may be provided afairly restricted heat map 1450A derived from metrics 1515A, whileclient C2 may view heat maps 1450B whose source metrics include both1515A and 1515B in the depicted embodiment.

Administrative users may view heat maps 1450C derived from the largermetrics collection 1510. The decision as to the subset of the metrics tobe used to respond to a given visualization request may be made by theTVS at run time in at least some embodiments, e.g., based on adetermination of the authorization settings, capabilities or roles ofthe requester.

Programmatic Interfaces for Visualizations

A number of different types of programmatic interfaces may be used toreceive and respond to visualization requests in different embodiments.FIG. 16 illustrates an example of a web-based programmatic interfacethat may be used to display heat maps for network topologies, accordingto at least some embodiments. As shown, the web-based interfacecomprises a web page 1602, in which nodes 1610A, 1610B and 1610C of anetwork topology are displayed together with respective sets ofperformance indicators 1620A, 1620B and 1620C.

The performance indicators 1620 show color-coded entries for a pluralityof resource types for each of the nodes in the depicted example: networkbandwidth (denoted by the label “BW” in FIG. 16), CPU, disk, and memory(denoted by the label “Mem”). A number of web-based controls formodifying or customizing the heat map are illustrated in FIG. 16. Forexample, a zoom control 1650 may be used by the viewer to zoom in or outto different portions of the topology. Resource selector 1652 may beused to filter out some types of resources from the visualization, or toadd more resource types. Similar selectors may also be usable to selecttime periods for the display (i.e., the period of time corresponding tothe collection of the metrics use for the performance indicators),network traffic categories, application types, and so on. In thedepicted embodiment, the viewer may also be allowed to specifythresholds 1654 to be used for the visualization—e.g., the viewer mayindicate that a measured transfer rate of 80% (or higher) of thebandwidth limit should be indicated by a red BW performance indicator, avalue less than 30% should be indicated by a green BW performanceindicator, and so on.

FIG. 17 illustrates example elements of a visualization request 1720that may be received by a topology visualization server 1410 via aprogrammatic interface 1770, according to at least some embodiments.Such a request may be via a web page similar to that shown in FIG. 16 insome embodiments, e.g., in response to a selection of one or morecontrols similar to controls 1650, 1652 or 1654 by a client oradministrator 1710. In other embodiments, such a request may besubmitted via a different GUI, an API invocation, or from a command-linetool.

As shown, the request 1720 may comprise a target service node list 1725,indicating the set of service nodes that are to be included in thevisualization. In some embodiments, a default setting for the set ofservice nodes may be used by the TVS 1410 if an indication of a specificset of nodes is not provided by the requester—e.g., by default, all thecompute instances assigned to a client account may be selected forvisualization, or all the instance hosts within a data center whoseadministrator issues the request may be considered candidates forinclusion in the visualization. The node set may be indicated explicitlyin some embodiments (e.g., by providing a list of node identifiers suchas compute instance identifiers), or by indicating filtering criteriathat can be used to search for node (e.g., a client may indicate thatcompute instances in a specified availability container should beincluded in the set). Categories of network traffic and/or resources tobe included in the visualization may also be indicated in the topologyvisualization request using element 1728. As mentioned earlier, trafficcategories may be defined by clients in some embodiments. In otherembodiments, a client or administrator 1710 may select from among aplurality of predefined traffic categories instead or in addition toclient-defined categories. In some embodiments, different categories ofresources may also be selectable—e.g., whether a heat map showing justcompute instances should be provided, or whether storage nodes should beincluded, and so on.

The granularity 1731 of the visualization may also be indicated in therequest 1720 in some embodiments—e.g., whether (with respect to networktraffic) a host-level view is desired, an instance-level view isdesired, and so on. The time range of the metrics collection fromvarious sources to be used for generating the visualization may beindicated via element 1734. In some implementations, a client may beable to request a dynamic visualization—e.g., the change in the value ofa performance indicator over a selected time period may be displayed inaccordance with a client preference indicated via element 1737. It isnoted that at least in some embodiments, the set of choices availablewith respect to the elements of requests 1720 may vary betweenusers—e.g., administrators may be able to specify a wider range ofpreferences than non-administrative users of the visualizationfunctionality. In at least one embodiment, administrators may beprovided a different set of programmatic interfaces 1770 by the TVS 1410than is provided to non-administrative users (e.g., a more extensive setof APIs may be available to users with administrative credentials thanothers). In response to the request 1720, the TVS 1410 may retrieve theappropriate set of data and provide a corresponding display in the formof heat map 1450 in the depicted embodiment.

Methods for Network Topology Visualization

FIG. 18 illustrates aspects of operations that may be performed togenerate topology visualizations comprising performance indicators ofvarious nodes of a distributed system, according to at least someembodiments. As shown in element 1801, a number of metrics may becollected by a TVS 1410 from a variety of data sources such as serviceinstances of various network-accessible services implemented in aprovider network, networking devices such as routers, switches, gatewaysand the like, as well instance hosts or other types of hardware orsoftware components of a distributed system. The collected metrics mayinclude, for example, networking-related metrics (such as inbound oroutbound traffic rates, currently applicable bandwidth limits, measuredand targeted latencies, network error counts, packet size distributions,or dropped packet counts), processor-related metrics (such as overallCPU utilizations, target threshold CPU utilization levels, kernel versususer utilization splits, active process/thread counts), memory-relatedmetrics (e.g., amount of free memory available, paging rates, etc.) andstorage-related metrics (disk or other storage device utilizations,average response latencies, queue lengths and so on). Metrics regardingcurrently-applied limits (e.g., bandwidth limits) or performance targets(e.g., latency targets) may be obtained in one embodiment from an NCS180. In some embodiments, some or all of the metrics may already becollected for other purposes, e.g., to determine bandwidth distributionamong various resources by an NCS 180, and the TVS may obtain themetrics from other components of the NCS or from a metrics database 190.In one embodiment, metrics may be piggybacked on other types of messagesby various data sources, such as heartbeat messages being sent inaccordance with a health monitoring protocol as described earlier.

A TVS 1410 may also obtain client account information (element 1804 ofFIG. 18) for various services being implemented in the distributedsystem, e.g., from an account management service 1420 of a providernetwork, or from an identity management service. The account informationmay include the relationships between different client accounts (e.g.,some client accounts may be linked to others for consolidated billing),as well as between client accounts and user accounts or group accounts,and so on. In at least some implementations, the TVS may obtain themappings between service nodes or instances and client accounts, e.g.,information indicating the client account on whose behalf a givencompute instance was launched. Physical layout information, such as thearrangements of instance hosts in different racks and rooms of a datacenter, the network links or paths between different nodes of thedistributed system and various network devices such as switches androuters may also be obtained (element 1807) in at least someembodiments. The physical layout information may be obtained, forexample, from an inventory service or other data center managementtools.

One or more network topologies may be determined (element 1810) forrelated nodes or resources, e.g., synthesizing the account informationtogether with the physical layout information. Depending on the size ofthe distributed system and its user base, generating and/or storing acomprehensive a network topology may require substantial computing,memory and/or storage resources in some embodiments. Accordingly,several different network topologies may be generated in someembodiments, e.g., one for each data center or one for each geographicalregion. A data set of performance indicators may be createdcorresponding to the topology or topologies using the collected metrics(element 1813). Any of a number of performance indicators may bedetermined or derived for various nodes of the topology, such as theratio of the traffic rates measured during a recent time interval andthe applied bandwidth limits that applied during the interval, the ratioof peak latencies observed during a time interval to target maximumlatencies, the CPU utilizations measured relative to targeted maximum orminimum levels, and so on.

A visualization request for at least a subset of the performanceindicators may be received (element 1816). The requester's authorizationsettings may be determined, and the appropriate subset of theperformance indicator data set that corresponds to the request and theauthorization settings may be obtained (element 1819). A color-codedvisualization in the form of a static or dynamic heat map may bedisplayed (element 1822). A client-side component such as a browser, abrowser plug-in, or a GUI, may be used to display the hat map on thebasis of data provided by a back-end TVS 1410. In some embodiments,other types of visualizations may also be provided upon request usingthe TVS 1410, such as histograms of performance indicators, pie charts,and the like. It is noted that in some embodiments, a topology may begenerated on demand, e.g., after the visualization request is receivedand based on the specific types of performance indicators requested.

Client-Requested Resource Usage Limit Reduction

In some distributed systems, the amount that clients have to pay forvarious services may be dependent on the network traffic generated atservice instances on behalf of the clients. In some scenarios, theservice may define an upper bound on the amount of data that can betransferred per service instance (or on the rate of data transfer), andcharges proportional to traffic may apply below such upper bounds.Clients may therefore have incentives to lower their network usage insuch environments, at least temporarily, in order to meet budgets. Forsome types of services, several different standardized service instancetypes may be made available to clients, with different networking limitsand/or rates applicable to each instance type. FIG. 19 illustrates anexample of a set of compute instance types that may be implemented for anetwork-accessible service, with respective bandwidth limits andrespective bandwidth usage pricing policies set for the differentinstance types, according to at least some embodiments. A table withnetwork-related settings for four different compute instance types 1902(“small”, “medium”, “large” and “extra-large” compute instances) definedby a virtual computing service are shown. The instance types may differin various properties, such as computing power, storage size limits,memory size, or overall pricing, in addition to the differences innetworking capabilities and bandwidth-related pricing.

In the depicted embodiment, separate bandwidth limits may be defined foroutbound traffic (column 1904) and inbound traffic (column 1908) foreach of two different traffic categories (labeled category “A” and “B”respectively). The categories may differ from one another with respectto whether the endpoints involved are within the provider network ornot, for example, or whether the traffic is directed to the publicInternet or not. In addition to the bandwidth limits for the differentinstance types, FIG. 19 also shows the outbound and inbound bandwidthpricing (columns 1906 and 1910 respectively), which may also bespecified separately for each of the two traffic categories. It is notedthat in practice, some prices may be set to zero in some embodiments bya provider network operator—for example, traffic between differentcompute instances that happen to be instantiated within the same datacenter may be “free”. The information illustrated in FIG. 19 may beaccessed by potential clients of the virtual computing service, and maybe taken into account by a client (along with other factors, such ascomputing performance requirements of the client's applications, pricingpolicies unrelated to bandwidth usage, and so on) when deciding how manyinstances of each type are to be acquired. Some clients may set aside abudget for networking-related costs using the kinds of informationprovided in FIG. 19, for example. Depending on the client applications'needs, it may sometimes be the case that a given client needs to utilizemuch less bandwidth that the maximum supported for their instance types,at least during some time periods, and thus may be able to manage costsmore effectively by requesting the imposition of lower limits. Forexample, in an environment in which a given business organization hasnumerous individual users who are authorized to access a givennetwork-accessible service, applying a lowered bandwidth limit may be amore reliable way of reducing networking-related costs that simplyrequesting the individual users to voluntarily control their respectivebandwidth usage.

In at least some embodiments, a centralized networking configurationservice similar to that illustrated in FIG. 1 may be used to implementcustomer-requested bandwidth limits and/or other types of resource usagereduction limits. Any of several types of networking-related limits maybe applied in response to client requests in various embodiments, e.g.,(a) an average traffic transmission rate that is not to be exceeded oversome period of time, (b) a peak traffic transmission rate that is not tobe exceeded even for short periods of time, (c) an upper limit to atotal number of bytes of data transferred, or (d) an upper limit on thenumber of network messages transferred. The periods of time over whichthe average limit and/or the peak limit are to apply may also beindicated by the clients in some embodiments. FIG. 20 illustratesexample elements of a resource usage limit reduction request 2020 thatmay be received by a networking configuration server 180, according toat least some embodiments. In some embodiments, as mentioned above, agiven billable customer account may have several user accountsassociated with it, and different resource usage limits may be appliedto the different user accounts. As shown, the request 2020 submitted viaa programmatic interface 2070 may include an element 2023 indicating oneor more user accounts to which the requested reductions are to beapplied. Group accounts may also be indicated in some embodiments. Inone embodiment, a client 2010 that has several different computeinstances or other resources allocated may wish to apply the lowerresource usage limits to some subset of those resources. The identifiersof the specific nodes or resources targeted may be indicated via anotherelement 2026 of limit reduction request 2020. A combined resource usagelimit for some set of service instances may be requested by the clientin some implementations. For example, a client may request that abandwidth limit of X GB/sec be applied collectively to instances I1, I2and I3, and the limit may be deemed to have been met if the sum ofbandwidth usages of the instances exceeds X GB/sec during a particulartime period.

Respective usage limits may be applied to different network trafficcategories in some embodiments. As described above, in some embodimentsa network-accessible service may define various categories of networktraffic, e.g., based on a range of network addresses of the endpoints,based on geographical locations of endpoints, and so on. In someembodiments, for example, respective limits may be applied to (a)traffic flowing over one or more public Internet links (b) trafficflowing within a provider network data center (c) traffic flowingbetween two provider network data centers within a given geographicalregion defined by the provider network (d) traffic flowing between twoprovider network data centers in two different geographical regionsdefined by the provider network, or (e) traffic flowing between theparticular service instance and nodes of a different service implementedat the provider network. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 20, the trafficcategory or categories targeted for the usage reduction may be indicatedvia element 2029.

With respect to limits on network traffic, the flow direction (whetherthe reduced limit is to be applied to inbound traffic, outbound traffic,or both) may be indicated via element 2032. A time range (e.g., a starttime, an end time, or both) over which the new limits are to be appliedmay be indicated via element 2035. The requested limit value (or theextent to which the current limit is to be reduced) may be indicated viaelement 2038 in the depicted embodiment. For example, element 2038 mayindicate that the current bandwidth limit should be reduced by 25%,instead of specifying an absolute value for the new limit. In someimplementations, when indicating a new limit, the client may alsoindicate aspects of the measurement approach to be used—e.g., if achange to an average bandwidth limit is requested, the time periods overwhich averages are to be computed may be specified, and if a lower peakbandwidth is requested, the time periods over which peak bandwidth is tobe quantified may be specified. In at least some embodiments, inaddition to specifying the reduced limits, a client 2010 may also defineone or more thresholds relative to the limits via element 2041, at whichrespective actions are to be taken by the network configuration server180. For example, a client 2010 may wish to be notified when a measuredtraffic rate in or out of a compute instance exceeds 80% of theclient-requested bandwidth limit. In some implementations, the requestmay include an indication of one or more destinations (e.g., e-mailaccounts) to which notifications are to be provided when the thresholdsare reached. Several different thresholds with respective actions to betaken may be indicated in some implementations for example, at 80% of abandwidth limit, a notification may be generated, and at 100%, theservice may be permitted to start dropping or discarding packets. Otherresponsive actions may be taken in some embodiments, either at theclient's explicit request or at the initiative of the service, such asqueuing some number of packets temporarily instead of transmitting them,or temporarily relaxing/increasing the limits.

In response to receiving request 2020, the NCS 180 may provide anacknowledgement 2050 of the change to the requesting client, andinitiate the appropriate configuration changes to apply the requestedlimits. For example, in a scenario in which a reduced bandwidth limit isto be applied to a compute instance implemented at an instance host, theNCS 180 may transmit the new limit to a component of a virtualizationmanagement software stack similar to stack 310 illustrated in FIG. 3 atthe instance host. In some embodiments, the NCS 180 may wait until theconfiguration changes have been committed before sending theacknowledgement 2050.

Resource usage limit reductions may be requested for instances of any ofa plurality of network-accessible services in some embodiments, such asa virtual computing service, various types of storage services, databaseservices, and the like. In some embodiments, instead of indicating alowered resource usage limit value directly, a client may indicate aresource budget limit that is to be met during some indicated timeperiod. In response, the networking configuration service may monitorthe resource usage of the client's service instances and determine thecorresponding billing costs (e.g., by communicating with billingmanagement components of the services involved). If a threshold close tothe budget limit (or the budget limit itself) is reached, the client maybe notified and/or one or more responsive actions may be taken. Thus, aresource budget limit may be treated analogously to (or translated to) aresource usage limit in at least some embodiments. It is noted that atleast in some embodiments, a configuration server that supportsclient-requested reductions in resource usage limits need not perform atleast some of the functions described earlier with respect to the NCSs180 of FIG. 1. For example, a configuration server that responds tousage reduction request 2020 need not necessarily generate proceduregraphs similar to those of FIG. 7, or classification trees similar tothose of FIG. 5.

As indicated earlier, in at least some embodiments a given billableclient account, e.g., an account established for an organization orentity whose personnel is to use one or more network-accessible servicesof a provider network, may have several different user accounts or groupaccounts associated with it. Distinct resource usage limits may be setfor different users or groups in such embodiments. FIG. 21 illustratesan example of the establishment of an overall resource usage limitsetting 2110 for a client account 2104A of a network-accessible service,and the establishment of related resource usage limit settings for usergroups, individual users and linked accounts, according to at least someembodiments. As shown, client account 2104A may have one or moreaffiliated group accounts 2120 defined, such as user group 2120A and2120B. Each group may in turn comprise a plurality of user accounts2123, such as user accounts 2123K and 2123L of group 2120B. Some useraccounts, such as 2123A, 2123B and 2123C, may not belong to any usergroups.

In the depicted embodiment, an overall resource usage limit 2110 (suchas a bandwidth limit) may be determined for all the accounts affiliatedwith the client account 2104A, such as the various group accounts 2120and the user accounts 2123. One or more additional client accounts, suchas account 2104B, may be linked to client account 2104A, e.g., forconsolidated billing or for other purposes. In one example scenario,client account 2104A may have been set up for an organization O1 thatimplements a particular application using provider network resources,while client account 2104B may have been set up for a differentorganization O2 that partners with O1, or utilizes the applicationimplemented by O1. Depending on the preferences of the entities forwhich the two client accounts are set up, the overall resource usagelimit 2110 may apply to linked user accounts as well. In at least someembodiments, the measured resource usage of all the users, groups andlinked accounts over a given time period may not exceed the overallresource usage limit applied to parent client account 2104A during thatperiod, e.g., in accordance with a usage limit summation policy 2190.

In some embodiments, distinct resource usage limits may be requested fordifferent users, groups, or linked accounts. For example, groups 2120Aand 2120B may have respective limits 2150A and 2150B assigned, whileusers 2123A, 2123B, 2123K and 2123L may have respective limits 2160A,2160B, 2160K and 2160L assigned. Some users (e.g., 2123C) and/or groupsmay not have their own limits defined, in which case their parent grouplimits and/or client account limits may apply. Linked account 2104B mayhave its own resource usage limit 2170 defined, which may also apply tousers and/or groups defined within the linked account. With respect tothe resource usage limits illustrated in FIG. 21, the client account2104A may be considered a “parent” entity, while the groups, users andlinked accounts may be considered “descendant” entities. A reduction inthe resource usage limits applied at any of the different granularitiesor levels indicated in FIG. 21 may be requested in at least someembodiments, e.g., via requests similar to request 2020 of FIG. 20. Ifthe requested reduction is to apply to a parent entity (such as clientaccount 2104A), the manner in which the reduction affects the limitsimposed on descendant entities may be indicated in the usage limitsummation policy 2190. For example, in one embodiment, if a 10%reduction in bandwidth is requested for the client account as a whole,the bandwidth limits to be applied to each user or group descending fromthe client account may also be reduced by 10% in accordance with oneselected policy 2190. In accordance with another policy 2190, as long as(a) any given descendant limit does not exceed the parent limit, and (b)the sum of the actual resource usage of all the descendant nodes over agiven time period does not exceed the parent limit, the descendantlimits may not be changed unless such a change is explicitly requested.

Methods for Supporting Client-Requested Resource Usage Limit Reduction

FIG. 22 illustrates aspects of operations that may be performed toenable clients to reduce resource usage limits for one or more nodes ofa network-accessible service, according to at least some embodiments. Asshown in element 2201, one or more programmatic interfaces may beimplemented to enable clients of a network-accessible service (such as amulti-tenant virtual computing service implemented at a providernetwork) to request, for one or more service instances to which aresource usage limit applies, a reduction in a resource usage limit. Theprogrammatic interfaces may include, for example, a web page or website, one or more APIs, a GUI, or a command-line tool.

A limit reduction request may be received via one of the programmaticinterfaces (element 2204), e.g., at a networking configuration server.The limit reduction request may comprise various constituent elementsregarding a new limit to be applied, such as some combination of theconstituents of request 2020 shown in FIG. 20. Specific client accounts,traffic categories, service instances, and/or time periods to which areduced limit is to be applied may be indicated in the request. Theappropriate configuration changes may be made in accordance with therequest, e.g., in a scenario in which the limits are to be applied tocompute instances, virtualization software components at the instancehosts affected may be notified regarding the new limits. Resource usagemetrics may be obtained from the targeted service instances (element2207) over time. In response to a detection that measured resource usagehas reached a threshold (where the threshold may be defined in terms ofthe newly applied limit), a notification may be generated (e.g., to therequester of the reduced limit, or to one or more designatednotification targets indicated by the requester) (element 2210). In someembodiments, other actions may be taken responsive to the detection thatthe threshold has been reached, e.g., if the resource usage limitapplies to bandwidth, one or more packets may be dropped or queued, orin some cases the limit may be temporarily relaxed. Such a usage limitrelaxation may be accompanied in some cases by a warning message (e.g.,a client may be warned that although the limit has been relaxedtemporarily, exceeding the limit or threshold in a sustained or repeatedmanner may lead to data loss). In at least some embodiments, one or moresuch thresholds and/or the corresponding responsive actions may beindicated by the client that requests the usage limit reduction.

FIG. 23 illustrates aspects of operations that may be performed toenable clients to submit queries associated with resource usage limitsat nodes of a distributed system, according to at least someembodiments. As shown in element 2301, one or more programmaticinterfaces may be implemented for various types of queries. Some clientsmay, for example, wish to determine a current state or metric ofresource usage, relative to the currently applicable limit. In anotherscenario, a client may wish to obtain trend information regarding thechanges in resource usage over time at one or more specified serviceinstances, so that for example the client is able to anticipate whenresource usage limits need to be changed. In yet another scenario,budget-based queries regarding resource usage may be supported by anetworking configuration server—for example, a client may indicate atarget budget limit for networking with respect to some serviceinstances, and request recommendations for changes to bandwidth limitsthat can help keep the client's costs under the budget. A query may bereceived from a client via one of the programmatic interfaces (element2304). Depending on the type of query, different actions may be takenbased on metrics collected from the service instances to which the queryapplies.

If the query pertains to a current state of resource usage (element2310), a response indicating the differences between recent measurementsof resource usage and the applicable limits at the service instances maybe provided (element 2351). If a trend query is received (element 2313),a response that indicates the variation in resource usage over aselected time interval may be provided (element 2354). If a budget-basedrecommendation query is received (element 2316), the networkingconfiguration server may perform the computations necessary to determineone or more usage limit reductions that would enable the client toachieve the budget goals, and provide the results of the computations ina query response (element 2357). Other types of queries may be supportedin some embodiments.

It is noted that in various embodiments, operations other than thoseillustrated in the flow diagrams of FIGS. 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 22 and 23may be used to implement various aspects of the networking configurationfunctionality described, and that some of the operations shown may notbe implemented, or may be implemented in a different order, or inparallel rather than sequentially. For example, it may be the case thatin some embodiments a multi-threaded NCS may be implemented, in whichcase several streams of the operations illustrated in FIG. 10 may beexecuted in parallel to generate and transmit respective sets ofclassification metadata for respective target nodes.

Use Cases

The techniques described above, of establishing a centralized set ofnetworking configuration servers to shape network traffic at numerousnodes of a distributed system, provide heat-map based resourcevisualization capabilities, and enable client-requested reductions inresource usage limits, may be useful in a number of scenarios. Forexample, provider networks may comprise hundreds of thousands ofinstance hosts and large numbers of network devices distributed amongseveral data centers, with at least a portion of the provider network'srevenue being derived based on the amount of network traffic that flowsin and out of the instance hosts. Using local modules at each instancehost or network device to make networking management decisions may leadto a number of problems in such large environments. First, it may not bepossible to obtain, at a given instance host, all the inputs necessaryto make intelligent networking management decisions. Second, thecomplexity of the decision logic required at the instance hosts mayrequire a substantial amount of computing capability of the instancehost, which may reduce the computing power left for client-requestedservice instances. When changes to the networking management logic needto be made, they may have to be transmitted and applied to all theinstance hosts, which may itself be a resource-intensive and error-proneexercise.

In contrast, by isolating the decision logic to be used for trafficshaping to a few networking configuration servers, inputs from a largerset of sources may be collected, leading to more informed decisions. Thenetworking configuration servers may be implemented using dedicatedcomputing resources that do not have to be shared with other services,avoiding contention for computing power. Updates to the networkingconfiguration logic may be applied much more easily than if hundreds orthousands of instance hosts had to be updated. The centralizednetworking configuration service may be able to easily provide clientswith unified views of networking status (including configurable heatmaps) that would otherwise have been difficult to obtain. The ability toreduce resource usage limits programmatically for specified serviceinstances, user accounts or group accounts may be helpful to clientsthat wish to control budgets.

Illustrative Computer System

In at least some embodiments, a server that implements a portion or allof one or more of the technologies described herein, including thetechniques to implement the networking configuration servers, networkingconfiguration service managers, topology visualization servers, and/orinstance hosts, may include a general-purpose computer system thatincludes or is configured to access one or more computer-accessiblemedia. FIG. 24 illustrates such a general-purpose computing device 3000.In the illustrated embodiment, computing device 3000 includes one ormore processors 3010 coupled to a system memory 3020 via an input/output(I/O) interface 3030. Computing device 3000 further includes a networkinterface 3040 coupled to I/O interface 3030.

In various embodiments, computing device 3000 may be a uniprocessorsystem including one processor 3010, or a multiprocessor systemincluding several processors 3010 (e.g., two, four, eight, or anothersuitable number). Processors 3010 may be any suitable processors capableof executing instructions. For example, in various embodiments,processors 3010 may be general-purpose or embedded processorsimplementing any of a variety of instruction set architectures (ISAs),such as the x86, PowerPC, SPARC, or MIPS ISAs, or any other suitableISA. In multiprocessor systems, each of processors 3010 may commonly,but not necessarily, implement the same ISA. In some implementations,graphics processing units (GPUs) may be used instead of, or in additionto, conventional processors.

System memory 3020 may be configured to store instructions and dataaccessible by processor(s) 3010. In various embodiments, system memory3020 may be implemented using any suitable memory technology, such asstatic random access memory (SRAM), synchronous dynamic RAM (SDRAM),nonvolatile/Flash-type memory, or any other type of memory. In theillustrated embodiment, program instructions and data implementing oneor more desired functions, such as those methods, techniques, and datadescribed above, are shown stored within system memory 3020 as code 3025and data 3026.

In one embodiment, I/O interface 3030 may be configured to coordinateI/O traffic between processor 3010, system memory 3020, and anyperipheral devices in the device, including network interface 3040 orother peripheral interfaces such as various types of persistent and/orvolatile storage devices used to store physical replicas of data objectpartitions. In some embodiments, I/O interface 3030 may perform anynecessary protocol, timing or other data transformations to convert datasignals from one component (e.g., system memory 3020) into a formatsuitable for use by another component (e.g., processor 3010). In someembodiments, I/O interface 3030 may include support for devices attachedthrough various types of peripheral buses, such as a variant of thePeripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus standard or the UniversalSerial Bus (USB) standard, for example. In some embodiments, thefunction of I/O interface 3030 may be split into two or more separatecomponents, such as a north bridge and a south bridge, for example.Also, in some embodiments some or all of the functionality of I/Ointerface 3030, such as an interface to system memory 3020, may beincorporated directly into processor 3010.

Network interface 3040 may be configured to allow data to be exchangedbetween computing device 3000 and other devices 3060 attached to anetwork or networks 3050, such as other computer systems or devices asillustrated in FIG. 1 through FIG. 23, for example. In variousembodiments, network interface 3040 may support communication via anysuitable wired or wireless general data networks, such as types ofEthernet network, for example. Additionally, network interface 3040 maysupport communication via telecommunications/telephony networks such asanalog voice networks or digital fiber communications networks, viastorage area networks such as Fibre Channel SANs, or via any othersuitable type of network and/or protocol.

In some embodiments, system memory 3020 may be one embodiment of acomputer-accessible medium configured to store program instructions anddata as described above for FIG. 1 through FIG. 23 for implementingembodiments of the corresponding methods and apparatus. However, inother embodiments, program instructions and/or data may be received,sent or stored upon different types of computer-accessible media.Generally speaking, a computer-accessible medium may includenon-transitory storage media or memory media such as magnetic or opticalmedia, e.g., disk or DVD/CD coupled to computing device 3000 via I/Ointerface 3030. A non-transitory computer-accessible storage medium mayalso include any volatile or non-volatile media such as RAM (e.g. SDRAM,DDR SDRAM, RDRAM, SRAM, etc.), ROM, etc., that may be included in someembodiments of computing device 3000 as system memory 3020 or anothertype of memory. Further, a computer-accessible medium may includetransmission media or signals such as electrical, electromagnetic, ordigital signals, conveyed via a communication medium such as a networkand/or a wireless link, such as may be implemented via network interface3040. Portions or all of multiple computing devices such as thatillustrated in FIG. 24 may be used to implement the describedfunctionality in various embodiments; for example, software componentsrunning on a variety of different devices and servers may collaborate toprovide the functionality. In some embodiments, portions of thedescribed functionality may be implemented using storage devices,network devices, or special-purpose computer systems, in addition to orinstead of being implemented using general-purpose computer systems. Theterm “computing device”, as used herein, refers to at least all thesetypes of devices, and is not limited to these types of devices.

CONCLUSION

Various embodiments may further include receiving, sending or storinginstructions and/or data implemented in accordance with the foregoingdescription upon a computer-accessible medium. Generally speaking, acomputer-accessible medium may include storage media or memory mediasuch as magnetic or optical media, e.g., disk or DVD/CD-ROM, volatile ornon-volatile media such as RAM (e.g. SDRAM, DDR, RDRAM, SRAM, etc.),ROM, etc., as well as transmission media or signals such as electrical,electromagnetic, or digital signals, conveyed via a communication mediumsuch as network and/or a wireless link.

The various methods as illustrated in the Figures and described hereinrepresent exemplary embodiments of methods. The methods may beimplemented in software, hardware, or a combination thereof. The orderof method may be changed, and various elements may be added, reordered,combined, omitted, modified, etc.

Various modifications and changes may be made as would be obvious to aperson skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. It isintended to embrace all such modifications and changes and, accordingly,the above description to be regarded in an illustrative rather than arestrictive sense.

1.-20. (canceled)
 21. A method, comprising: performing, at one or morecomputing devices: applying a resource limit on one or more categoriesof network traffic at a portion of a network-accessible service;obtaining a programmatic request to reduce the resource limit; andinitiating one or more actions based at least in part on theprogrammatic request.
 22. The method as recited in claim 21, wherein theportion of the network-accessible service comprises one or more serviceinstances, the method further comprising performing, at the one or morecomputing devices: obtaining one or more metrics corresponding to theone or more categories of network traffic at the one or more serviceinstances; and detecting, using the obtained one or more metrics priorto initiating the one or more actions, that a resource usage has met athreshold criterion indicated in the programmatic request.
 23. Themethod as recited in claim 21, wherein the programmatic requestindicates a reduced resource limit comprising one or more of: (a) anaverage traffic transmission rate that is not to be exceeded, (b) a peaktraffic transmission rate that is not to be exceeded, (c) an upper limitto a number of bytes of data transferred, or (d) an upper limit on thenumber of network messages transferred.
 24. The method as recited inclaim 21, wherein the programmatic request indicates at least aparticular category of network traffic whose resource limit is to bereduced, wherein the particular category comprises one or more of: (a)traffic flowing over one or more public Internet links, (b) trafficflowing within a provider network data center, (c) traffic flowingbetween two provider network data centers, (d) traffic flowing between apair of network-accessible services of one or more provider networks or(e) traffic flowing between a pair of geographic locations.
 25. Themethod as recited in claim 21, wherein the programmatic requestindicates one or more directions of network traffic flow whose resourcelimit is to be reduced, including one or more of: (a) traffic flowingfrom the particular service instance to one or more destinations; (b)traffic flowing to the particular service instance from one or moresources.
 26. The method as recited in claim 21, wherein the one or moreactions comprise one or more of: (a) discarding one or more packets, (b)queuing one or more packets, (c) increasing, for a particular timeperiod, the resource limit to be imposed on network traffic at a serviceinstance of the network-accessible service, or (d) generating anotification.
 27. The method as recited in claim 21, wherein thenetwork-accessible service comprises one or more of: (a) a virtualcomputing service, (b) a storage service, or (c) a database service. 28.A system, comprising: one or more computing devices; wherein the one ormore computing devices include instructions that upon execution on oracross one or more processors cause the one or more computing devicesto: apply a resource limit on one or more categories of network trafficat a portion of a network-accessible service; obtain a programmaticrequest to reduce the resource limit; and initiate one or more actionsbased at least in part on the programmatic request.
 29. The system asrecited in claim 28, wherein the programmatic request indicates (a) asubset of service instances of the network-accessible service,comprising a first service instance and a second service instance, and(b) that the combined resource usage of the subset is not to exceed athreshold.
 30. The system as recited in claim 28, wherein theprogrammatic request indicates a time period for which the resourcelimit is to be reduced.
 31. The system as recited in claim 28, whereinthe programmatic request indicates one or more accounts of a pluralityof accounts associated with the network-accessible service, wherein theresource limit is to be reduced for network traffic associated with theone or more accounts.
 32. The system as recited in claim 28, wherein theprogrammatic request indicates a time period over which a metric is tobe computed to determine whether the resource limit has been reduced.33. The system as recited in claim 28, wherein the one or more computingdevices include further instructions that upon execution on or acrossthe one or more processors further cause the one or more computingdevices to: provide, in response to another programmatic request, anindication of changes in resource usage over time at one or more serviceinstances of the portion of the network-accessible service.
 34. Thesystem as recited in claim 28, wherein the one or more actions compriseone or more of: (a) discarding one or more packets, (b) queuing one ormore packets, (c) increasing, for a particular time period, the resourcelimit to be imposed on network traffic at a service instance of thenetwork-accessible service, or (d) generating a notification.
 35. One ormore non-transitory computer-accessible storage media storing programinstructions that when executed on or across one or more processorscause one or more computer systems to: impose a resource limit on one ormore categories of network traffic at a portion of a network-accessibleservice; obtain a programmatic request to reduce the resource limit; andinitiate one or more actions based at least in part on the programmaticrequest.
 36. The one or more non-transitory computer-accessible storagemedia as recited in claim 35, wherein the portion of thenetwork-accessible service comprises one or more service instances,wherein the one or more non-transitory computer-accessible storage mediastore further program instructions that when executed on or across oneor more processors further cause the one or more computer systems to:obtain one or more metrics corresponding to the one or more categoriesof network traffic at the one or more service instances; and detect,using the obtained one or more metrics prior to initiating the one ormore actions, that a resource usage has met a threshold criterionindicated in the programmatic request.
 37. The one or morenon-transitory computer-accessible storage media as recited in claim 35,wherein the programmatic request indicates a reduced resource limitcomprising one or more of: (a) an average traffic transmission rate thatis not to be exceeded, (b) a peak traffic transmission rate that is notto be exceeded, (c) an upper limit to a number of bytes of datatransferred, or (d) an upper limit on the number of network messagestransferred.
 38. The one or more non-transitory computer-accessiblestorage media as recited in claim 35, wherein the programmatic requestindicates at least a particular category of network traffic whoseresource limit is to be reduced, wherein the particular categorycomprises one or more of: (a) traffic flowing over one or more publicInternet links, (b) traffic flowing within a provider network datacenter, (c) traffic flowing between two provider network data centers,(d) traffic flowing between a pair of network-accessible services of oneor more provider networks, or (e) traffic flowing between a pair ofgeographic locations.
 39. The one or more non-transitorycomputer-accessible storage media as recited in claim 35, wherein theprogrammatic request indicates one or more directions of network trafficflow whose resource limit is to be reduced, including one or more of:(a) traffic flowing from the particular service instance to one or moredestinations; (b) traffic flowing to the particular service instancefrom one or more sources.
 40. The one or more non-transitorycomputer-accessible storage media as recited in claim 35, wherein theone or more actions comprise one or more of: (a) discarding one or morepackets, (b) queuing one or more packets, (c) increasing, for aparticular time period, the resource limit to be imposed on networktraffic at a service instance of the network-accessible service, or (d)generating a notification.